In recent times, the Chiang family has acted as an umbilical cord connecting Taiwan and China, and the bodies of former presidents General Chiang Kai-shek (
The decision for the two Chiangs to be laid to rest in Taiwan represents the fact that the political force that arrived in Taiwan from China has given up its dream of "retaking the mainland."
Prior to 1949, the fascist Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) led by Chiang Kai-shek, plagued with internal corruption, lost the support of the Chinese people. Their defeat at the hands of the Communists forced them to flee to Taiwan. In Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek resumed his strong-man tactics and maintained martial law, in the course of which countless lives were sacrificed during the 228 incident and the period of "White Terror." Both Chiang Kai-shek and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo, viewed Taiwan as merely a base of operations, a springboard from which to return to China. As a result, they gave little thought to the long-term construction of Taiwan or the welfare of its people.
When the US-ROC Mutual Defense Treaty was signed in 1954, it was clear that the Chiang family no longer believed that there was any hope of retaking China, so this idea became a tool for them to maintain their monopoly on political power.
Only during his later years in power did Chiang Ching-kuo realize that the KMT, an alien power in Taiwan, would never return to China, and if he did not move towards localization, the KMT would have no place left to go. He therefore promoted people from the local elite to let Taiwanese people rule Taiwan, and tolerated the democratization and liberalization of Taiwan. The KMT's political localization was meant to maintain the KMT's political power and turn Taiwan into a base for opposing Beijing.
This move showed that he was already preparing to remain in Taiwan. In addition, he often travelled to different areas in Taiwan in his later years, building an image of being close to the people. He even said that "I am also Taiwanese," and to a certain degree developed emotional bonds with Taiwan.
Returning to the place of one's birth to die is a custom among Chinese people. So although there are many in Taiwan who still harbor a hatred of the Chiang family, there are many others who respect them and find the idea of their burial in Taiwan more congenial than to be returned to a China they regard as an enemy and whose intentions are uncertain.
Madam Chiang Kai-shek, who represents the first generation who moved to Taiwan, has now passed away, and the Chiang family no longer has the responsibility or the duty to bring the KMT back to power in China. Faina Chiang Fang-liang has decided that it is in the interests of the Chiang family that the two Chiangs should now be buried in Taiwan and end the rootlessness of the Chiang family since they moved from China. Now that the family's roots have been planted in Taiwan, Chiang Ching-kuo's claim that he "is also Taiwanese" can finally be said with a clear conscience.
The establishment of the Chiang family roots in Taiwan will also resolve many of the contradictions in the self-identification of the Mainlanders who came over with them. The burial will help them to accept the reality that they have long since become Taiwanese, and this in turn will help resolve the issue of Taiwan's own identity.
Now that the two Chiangs will be buried in Taiwan, the KMT will also have to think clearly about whether they are the Chinese Nationalist Party or the "Taiwan Nationalist Party."
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS