President Chen Shui-bian (
However, due to the official restraints of their mission, they may not be able to challenge the hypocrisy of the major powers, which advocate maintaining the so-called status quo and stability in the region at the expense of democracy.
I have no doubt about US President George W. Bush's sincerity in support of democracy in Taiwan. When he stated his opposition to any unilateral decision either by China or Taiwan to change the status quo, he conspicuously avoided using the word "referendum."
Even senior US officials prefer to remain anonymous when they imply that the US is concerned about the referendum.
Bush and his administration decline to define the term "status quo," but the PRC uses its propaganda campaign to try to define the status quo as being based on "one China," with Taiwan a part of China. Beijing claims that any referendum in Taiwan is a step toward Taiwanese independence. Unlike the US, the PRC is not ashamed to oppose a democratic referendum process.
For Taiwan, it is unfortunate that certain China hands have a stubborn habit of appeasing the PRC at the expense of the fundamental political rights of the people of Taiwan.
They do not blame the PRC's threat to use force for disrupting stability in the Taiwan Strait, but instead accuse Taiwan's democratization of being a cause for concern.
If the US and China are sincere about maintaining stability in the region, the right approach is for the major powers to respect the democratic process and recognize the true status quo concerning national borders -- and integrate Taiwan and North Korea into the international community.
Taiwan is a full democracy and North Korea, like the PRC, is a communist totalitarian regime. North Korea is violating international rules and Taiwan is not. But to a certain degree both of them have been isolated from the international community. At the insistence of South Korea, the US and Japan refuse to recognize the rogue state of North Korea.
Submitting to the demands of the PRC, the US, Japan, South Korea and other major powers refuse to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
If a Taiwan under authoritarian rule was good enough for the US, Japan and other major powers to recognize as a sovereign state, a democratic Taiwan is in a better position to be recognized as a sovereign state.
Taiwan has been excluded from the UN and international organizations such as the World Bank and the World Health Organization for over 30 years. The US and Japan have refused to recognize Taiwan as an independent state for over two decades. This is not the right way to handle international affairs.
Pro-China scholars and politicians used to argued that isolating China could only be bad for stability. Similarly, the isolation of Taiwan and North Korea is not helpful for the stability of the region. Therefore, the best approach for managing the two flash points in East Asia is for the major powers to respect democracy and recognize the status quo.
The US, Japan and South Korea should recognize North Korea and the US, Japan, Russia and South Korea should persuade the PRC to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state and integrate Taiwan into the international community.
It was wrong and embarrassing for Bush to indicate opposition to Taiwan's democratic referendum process. He and his aides should know better.
When Lithuania declared independence and faced the threat of a military crackdown by the former Soviet Union, then US president George Bush instructed ambassador Jack Matlock to warn Soviet president Mikhail Gobarchev against the use of force and suggested a referendum as a proper way to resolve the impasse.
The current US president should stand firm on principle in dealing with disputes in the region. He should reassess the "one China" policy, respect democratic evolution and recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
Inclusion of Taiwan in the international community, instead of exclusion, will contribute to stability in the region.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS