On April 14, 1997, entertainment star Pai Ping-ping's (白冰冰) daughter Pai Hsiao-yen (白曉燕) was murdered. On November 18 of the same year, her murderer Chen Chin-hsing (陳進興) held a military attache of the South African embassy and his family hostage in Tienmu (天母).
Two hostages were accidentally shot by stray bullets fired by Chen. Had the injured hostages not been rescued quickly, not only would their lives have been at grave risk, but a panic-stricken Chen may have just gone on a rampage killing everyone in the house. However, if the police forced entry, Chen might also have started a shooting spree before killing himself. Eventually, Chen granted me permission to enter the house and bring out the injured hostages.
As a result of my involvement in this case, I have a few observations to share.
1. In the past, the media has involved itself extensively in many criminal cases and, in general, cooperated with the police in major kidnapping cases to ensure the safety of the hostages.
However, the Pai case was an exception to this practice. The media repeatedly overstepped its bounds. In fact, one journal revealed confidential information regarding the case. To avoid obstruction to crime investigation and danger to the hostages as a result of this leak, the police spent more than NT$400,000 in a single day to buy all copies of the magazine.
2. The courage and determination of Pai Hsia-yen's mother, Pai Ping-ping, in standing up against the kidnappers was admirable. She took detailed notes of every part of the investigation and offered hypotheses about the details of the crime to the police. Her ability to maintain composure and participate in the rescue, despite an extremely sad and fearful mental state, was truly beneficial.
3. Pai Ping-ping's public statement reminded the general public that domestic issues, including crime, were no less important than economic and foreign-relations problems. Never before had one criminal case been the catalyst for the improvement of social conditions.
Demonstrations held on May 4 and 18 that year protesting against the rising crime rate were also ground-breaking. Never before had any non-political demonstrations been participated in by so many people representing such a broad spectrum of Taiwan society. The orderly fashion and peaceful demeanor of the demonstrators had also never been seen before in Taiwan. Recent public concern over crime stemmed largely from the Pai case.
4. The kidnappers' unique approach and characteristics forced the police to re-establish a crisis-management and hostage-rescue negotiation mechanism. The challenge posed to old beliefs and outdated equipment was educational and the police's capacity to deal with such circumstances has since been made all the better.
5. The establishment of an anti-kidnapping team, the drafting of a telecommunications surveillance law and a domestic violence prevention law to protect the safety of women and children, among others, were some of the measures brought, in part, by the Pai case. However, not enough has been done. In terms of personal safety, we need preventive, rather than after-the-fact, measures. Besides making new laws, we also need to improve environmental design to improve safety as well as implement a community policing system.
Hou Yu-ih is the deputy commissioner of the Criminal Investigation Bureau.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics