In a swift reversal of fortunes, countries that had been hardest hit by US President Donald Trump’s tariffs have emerged as the biggest winners from the US Supreme Court’s decision to strike down his emergency levies.
China, India and Brazil are among those now seeing lower tariff rates for shipments to the US after the court ruled Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose duties was illegal.
While Trump subsequently announced plans for a 15 percent global rate, Bloomberg Economics said that would mean an average effective tariff rate of about 12 percent — the lowest since his “Liberation Day” tariffs were released in April last year.
Photo: Getty Images North America / Getty Images via AFP
Morgan Stanley economists said the weighted average tariff rate for Asia will fall to 17 percent from 20 percent, with average levies on goods from China declining to 24 percent from 32 percent. Relief might be temporary as the Trump administration seeks to impose sectoral and economy-specific duties to rebuild its tariff regime.
Still, “the peak level of uncertainty on tariffs and trade tensions has passed,” Morgan Stanley economists led by Chetan Ahya wrote in a note.
The new across-the-board levy effectively resets the playing field for the US’ trade partners.
For the likes of China, which also saw a 10 percent fentanyl tariff scrapped by the courts, exports now face less punitive rates. Losers include economies including the UK and Australia that had negotiated lower levies of 10 percent under the old “reciprocal” framework.
Senior US officials are pressing partners including the EU and Japan to stick to commitments they made in earlier negotiations. They also sought continuity in the one-year truce with China, with Trump planning to soon visit Beijing for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
“We want to make sure that China is complying with its part of the deal,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said. “So that means they continue to buy the products they said they would buy.”
Canada and Mexico had also faced fentanyl-related levies, so they win out, as those no longer apply.
If exemptions under the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement remain in place, they would emerge in a “very favorable position,” Bloomberg Economics analysts Nicole Gorton-Caratelli, Chris Kennedy and Maeva Cousin wrote in a note.
The new 15 percent levy leaves countries with the earlier 10 percent rate worse off, with Australia and the UK in that position. Meantime, those that previously had what was then a competitive 15 percent level applied on their exports — such as Japan — have now seen that advantage stripped away.
Even as the court ruling adds a fresh layer of uncertainty, analysts are pointing to the resilience of global commerce over the past year and the relatively minor shift in the overall average tariff rate to suggest the near-term effects might prove limited.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc economists, including David Mericle, estimated that the combination of the US Supreme Court ruling and the newly announced Section 122 tariff would reduce the increase in the effective tariff rate since the start of last year from just more than 10 percentage points to 9 percentage points.
“Imports from countries that will experience meaningful tariff reductions from the latest policy changes are likely to pick up in coming months,” Goldman economists wrote. “But the impact on GDP should be largely offset by increased inventory accumulation and consumption, reduced imports from other countries through which trade had been rerouted, and small reductions in imports from countries whose tariff rate has risen.”
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI
Apple Inc increased iPhone production in India by about 53 percent last year and now makes a quarter of its marquee devices there, reflecting the US company’s efforts to avoid tariffs on China. The company assembled about 55 million iPhones in India last year, up from 36 million a year earlier, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named because the numbers aren’t public. Apple makes about 220 million to 230 million iPhones a year globally, with India’s share of the total increasing rapidly. Apple has accelerated its expansion in the world’s most populous country in recent years, bolstered
A new worry has been rippling across the stock market lately: Entire businesses, not just their employees, might be thrown out of work. While most economists say fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) job apocalypse are overblown, seismic shifts have happened in the past after big tech breakthroughs. The IT revolution of the 1990s led to a surge in productivity that sped up the US economy for several years. It also rendered companies or even industries largely redundant — from travel agents and stockbrokers to classified advertising and newspapers, or video rental stores. Economists expect AI would deliver higher productivity,