Chinese firms are mostly less profitable than comparable US companies, leaving exporters at risk of a further hit to earnings as US President Donald Trump’s tariffs sap demand, according to new research from Bloomberg Economics.
While Chinese companies can defend their “razor-thin margins by leveraging their market dominance” in the short term, at some point US customers would have to raise prices in response, Bloomberg China economists Chang Shu (舒暢) and David Qu (曲天石) wrote.
“Tariffs will eventually pass through to consumers, weighing on demand — a pattern seen in the first trade war in the late 2010s,” they said. “The hit could be even harsher this time, as tariffs are broader and US restrictions on transshipments stricter.”
Photo: AFP
Thinner profitability would likely make the US even less of a draw for Chinese exporters, as US consumers show signs of moving away from products most directly exposed to tariffs.
China’s shipments to the US have already seen five months of double-digit declines, a slump more than offset by improved sales in other major markets.
The net profit margins of US listed companies in tradeable goods averaged about 12 percent last year, more than double the 4.9 percent of their Chinese peers, according to the research from Bloomberg Economics.
Nearly 30 percent of sectors in the US have profit margins more than 10 percent higher than their Chinese competitors, it showed.
US communications and technology hardware firms report profit margins of more than 20 percent, compared with about 3 percent for Chinese businesses, the research showed.
The gap is also wide for builders and makers of household products.
Chinese companies have reacted to weak demand at home by cutting prices and exporting more around the world, although that is not likely to boost overall profits.
Data released last week showed that profits of large Chinese industrial firms in the first eight months of this year were up less than 1 percent from last year. While earnings jumped last month, economists have attributed it in part to a low base of comparison last year.
In the year through July, 29 percent of these firms were making a loss, Bloomberg analysis of the official data shows, the same level as last year’s record.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
OPTION: Uber said it could provide higher pay for batch trips, if incentives for batching is not removed entirely, as the latter would force it to pass on the costs to consumers Uber Technologies Inc yesterday warned that proposed restrictions on batching orders and minimum wages could prompt a NT$20 delivery fee increase in Taiwan, as lower efficiency would drive up costs. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made the remarks yesterday during his visit to Taiwan. He is on a multileg trip to the region, which includes stops in South Korea and Japan. His visit coincided the release last month of the Ministry of Labor’s draft bill on the delivery sector, which aims to safeguard delivery workers’ rights and improve their welfare. The ministry set the minimum pay for local food delivery drivers at
RSS