Why should only the wealthy get to ride unicorns to further riches?
Privately held firms with at least US$1 billion in value come with daunting price tags that freeze out ordinary investors. Banks that help unicorns raise money are glad to chalk up a few bulky subscriptions — US$1 million and more — from top clients. It works fine with regulators who do not want the general public to lose their life savings on risky bets.
Were the ticket, say, US$1,000, even affluent millennials might want to take a punt on the next Facebook Inc or Uber Technologies Inc without having to wait for a stock market debut.
Photo: AFP
That wait is only getting longer. A sizable chunk of US$2.5 trillion of uncalled private equity — dry powder — is with venture capital funds that promising companies can use to delay going public and spread the wealth more evenly.
The “status quo” is unfair. Until its recent initial public offering (IPO), the moneyed folk who would never deign to set foot in an Airbnb Inc property could buy in, whereas a younger, regular user could not. This gap in access could also be expensive.
The “massive downward pressure on wages” that the International Labour Organization has forecast for the near term — particularly for women — could make it harder for millennials to build nest eggs if interest rates remain low for long.
However, the existing setup lacks the technology to make private securities a mass-market product.
“Private banks only show deals to clients with net worth above US$50 million,” said Oi Yee Choo, chief commercial officer of Istox, a Singapore-based digital securities platform that aims to democratize finance by fractionalizing it.
It is not the first player to do so. San Francisco-based Forge Global Inc made available unlisted shares of Spotify Technology SA, Snap Inc and Square Inc to sovereign wealth funds, family offices and wealth managers.
The Peter Thiel-backed firm is now expanding in Asia. The timing is right.
Thanks to Airbnb and DoorDash Inc, venture-backed IPOs had a banner 2020, encouraging Asian unicorns to accelerate their own listing plans. The closer the offering, the greater the retail appetite.
Blockchain might offer a way to meet this demand. Istox, a start-up that counts Singapore’s stock exchange and state investment firm among its investors, is turning securities into tokens on distributed ledgers.
These are not public and permission-less like bitcoin. Istox tokens have no value in the outside world. Nevertheless, by using them, time-consuming manual processes can be automated via smart contracts — software code that self-executes when conditions are met. A three-day settlement cycle can be shortened to seconds. Bespoke investments can be resized as tiny parcels.
Istox, which is regulated by Singapore’s monetary authority, has given people access to the world’s first digitized unicorn fund for as little as US$20,000.
After securing US$50 million in Series A funding this week from a couple of Japanese government-backed investors and others, the goal is to create an exchange that would let individuals “participate in the growth of large pre-IPO companies like Grab and TransferWise, for example,” Choo said.
The technology can handle a ticket size as low as US$500.
Grab Holdings Ltd, which began as a ride-hailing service in Southeast Asia, is now a financial services player with a Singapore digital bank license.
UK-based TransferWise has found its niche in offering cheaper international money transfers than banks. If early backers or employees of unicorns can cash out when they want, the benefit of their US$1.4 trillion market value might reach more people.
Despite the lure of red-hot equities and the appeal of day-trading platforms like Robinhood Markets Inc, the 25-to-40 age group in the US has a slightly higher exposure to cash than older cohorts. The future of work and wages is under a cloud.
If millennials’ average US$83,000 retirement account balance does not get a return boost, they would lag behind wealthier older generations.
In Asia, too, inequality is worsening in ways that would matter for both states and markets, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (ANZ) has said.
Unemployment is soaring among Indonesia’s less-educated workers, South Korea’s part-time labor force is facing a job crunch, and India’s real wages have cratered.
To top it all, “the performance of financial assets is becoming a source of inequality,” ANZ analysts Sanjay Mathur and Dhiraj Nim said.
Before politicians reach for the hammer of taxation to tackle the inequality problem, they should use the mallet of technology.
Expectations must be realistic, though, about gains from this kind of investment democratization. Sustained 20 percent annual returns are increasingly something that only top private equity managers can boast.
In the US, the private equity industry’s 10-year performance advantage over public markets disappeared in 2019. The US-China cold war and Beijing’s scuttling of Ant Group Co’s (螞蟻集團) IPO — a reining in of “tech, trade and titans,” as Morgan Stanley puts it — might also weigh on future returns.
Singapore has not had much luck in competing with Hong Kong for hot IPOs.
However, by offering a pragmatic regulatory environment for enterprises that use blockchain — not necessarily for cryptocurrencies, but for eliminating inefficiencies in everything from remittances to trade finance and asset management — the financial center is acknowledging a simple reality: When it comes to making — or saving — money, millennials and generation Z will expect a fairer deal. They are the early adopters of tech unicorns’ products. Why should they be the last in line to get rich from businesses they have to explain to their mums and dads?
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. He previously was a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He has also worked for the Straits Times, ET NOW and Bloomberg News.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
JITTERS: Nexperia has a 20 percent market share for chips powering simpler features such as window controls, and changing supply chains could take years European carmakers are looking into ways to scratch components made with parts from China, spooked by deepening geopolitical spats playing out through chipmaker Nexperia BV and Beijing’s export controls on rare earths. To protect operations from trade ructions, several automakers are pushing major suppliers to find permanent alternatives to Chinese semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The industry is considering broader changes to its supply chain to adapt to shifting geopolitics, Europe’s main suppliers lobby CLEPA head Matthias Zink said. “We had some indications already — questions like: ‘How can you supply me without this dependency on China?’” Zink, who also
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) received about NT$147 billion (US$4.71 billion) in subsidies from the US, Japanese, German and Chinese governments over the past two years for its global expansion. Financial data compiled by the world’s largest contract chipmaker showed the company secured NT$4.77 billion in subsidies from the governments in the third quarter, bringing the total for the first three quarters of the year to about NT$71.9 billion. Along with the NT$75.16 billion in financial aid TSMC received last year, the chipmaker obtained NT$147 billion in subsidies in almost two years, the data showed. The subsidies received by its subsidiaries —
At least US$50 million for the freedom of an Emirati sheikh: That is the king’s ransom paid two weeks ago to militants linked to al-Qaeda who are pushing to topple the Malian government and impose Islamic law. Alongside a crippling fuel blockade, the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM) has made kidnapping wealthy foreigners for a ransom a pillar of its strategy of “economic jihad.” Its goal: Oust the junta, which has struggled to contain Mali’s decade-long insurgency since taking power following back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, by scaring away investors and paralyzing the west African country’s economy.
The number of Taiwanese working in the US rose to a record high of 137,000 last year, driven largely by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) rapid overseas expansion, according to government data released yesterday. A total of 666,000 Taiwanese nationals were employed abroad last year, an increase of 45,000 from 2023 and the highest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, data from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) showed. Overseas employment had steadily increased between 2009 and 2019, peaking at 739,000, before plunging to 319,000 in 2021 amid US-China trade tensions, global supply chain shifts, reshoring by Taiwanese companies and
RSS