The huge cost of the COVID-19 pandemic is upending Japan’s seven-year experiment to rescue the economy from its debt time bomb, as recession fears prompt calls for “helicopter money” — unlimited spending bankrolled by the central bank.
Days after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe launched a nearly US$1 trillion stimulus package to battle the pandemic’s financial fallout, some lawmakers of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party are calling for even bigger spending.
Already, the government plans to boost bond issuance to a five-year high of ¥147 trillion (US$1.36 trillion), or 30 percent of the size of Japan’s economy, to pay for the stimulus.
Photo: Reuters
However, even as global governments and central banks pull out all the stops to reduce the economic fallout, Japan is a grim reminder that a debt time bomb might be inescapable.
Japan could issue even more debt, as Japanese Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy Yasutoshi Nishimura has said that the latest package would not be the last if growth remains in danger.
The missed opportunity to fix Japan’s finances might squeeze spending for the younger generation and constrain the country’s options for supporting one of the world’s fastest-aging populations.
It also marks a death knell for Abe’s fiscal policy, which relied on higher tax revenue backed by strong economic growth — instead of painful spending cuts — to restore Japan’s fiscal health, analysts said.
“Abenomics has kept the economy in good shape for quite a long time,” former Bank of Japan (BOJ) board member Takahide Kiuchi said, pointing to Abe’s stimulus policies, launched in late 2012, to pull the country out of deflation.
“If that time had been spent fixing Japan’s finances, the government would have had more scope to boost spending without relying excessively on debt issuance,” Kiuchi said. “The government and the BOJ were complacent. They’re responsible for this mess.”
Abe was elected in 2012 with a pledge to beat deflation through “Abenomics” — a mix of aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus steps with structural reforms.
The plan was to stoke the economy enough so that companies reaped profits and paid more taxes, which in turn would let Japan reduce its huge debt burden without spending cuts.
Abenomics pushed back against a view long preached by the powerful Japanese Ministry of Finance that without fiscal austerity, Japan could not fund the rising cost of an aging population.
Growth and inflation did perk up, but the time bought by the central bank’s aggressive stimulus was not spent wisely.
Abe twice delayed a sales tax increase after the first one triggered a recession, forcing the finance ministry into retreat.
As fiscal hawks lost clout, spending continued to balloon and Abe’s administration pushed back the time frame for meeting its target to balance the budget.
That was a defeat for BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, a former finance ministry bureaucrat who consistently called for government efforts to keep Japan’s fiscal house in order while the central bank kept borrowing costs ultra-low.
However, what was intended to be a quick fix to beat deflation turned into a long-term battle, resulting in an unprecedented policy in which the BOJ has pledged to cap long-term interest rates at zero.
The policy, dubbed “yield curve control,” gave lawmakers an excuse to keep spending without having to worry about an abrupt spike in bond yields.
“Under yield curve control, the BOJ can buy unlimited amounts of bonds if yields rise,” said Kazuo Momma, a former central bank executive who is now an economist at Mizuho Research Institute Ltd. “The current low-rate, low-inflation environment is a convenient one for huge government spending.”
Now, Japan’s economy is on the cusp of a recession as the pandemic hits global and domestic demand, emboldening proponents of loose fiscal policy.
Some ruling party lawmakers are urging for the central bank to provide unlimited funding to the government to distribute as cash to the public.
Japanese Minister of Finance Taro Aso on Friday said that the government had no plans to ask the BOJ to finance its debt.
The idea, which is gaining traction in other economies, could be particularly dangerous for Japan given its ¥1.13 quadrillion debt pile — the largest among industrialized nations.
Even with ultra-low borrowing costs, debt-servicing and social welfare costs together make up 60 percent of Japan’s annual spending, compared with just 5 percent for education.
“The ballooning welfare and debt-servicing costs are suppressing other spending,” said Atsushi Takeda, chief economist at Itochu Economic Research Institute. “The government is running out of capacity to allocate resources to technological innovation, infrastructure rebuilding and talented human resources — all crucial for economic growth.”
However, proponents have said that radical ideas are necessary to help Japan weather the pandemic.
Without huge spending backed by central bank money printing, Japan would see a spike in job losses and bankruptcies that could delay an economic recovery once the virus is contained, they said.
“Crisis times like now are exactly when we need to deploy helicopter money,” said Shoji Nishida, a senior ruling party official who has regular interaction with Abe. “Fiscal reform should be thrown out the window.”
TECH PARTNERSHIP: The deal with Arizona-based Amkor would provide TSMC with advanced packing and test capacities, a requirement to serve US customers Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is collaborating with Amkor Technology Inc to provide local advanced packaging and test capacities in Arizona to address customer requirements for geographical flexibility in chip manufacturing. As part of the agreement, TSMC, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, would contract turnkey advanced packaging and test services from Amkor at their planned facility in Peoria, Arizona, a joint statement released yesterday said. TSMC would leverage these services to support its customers, particularly those using TSMC’s advanced wafer fabrication facilities in Phoenix, Arizona, it said. The companies would jointly define the specific packaging technologies, such as TSMC’s Integrated
China’s economic planning agency yesterday outlined details of measures aimed at boosting the economy, but refrained from major spending initiatives. The piecemeal nature of the plans announced yesterday appeared to disappoint investors who were hoping for bolder moves, and the Shanghai Composite Index gave up a 10 percent initial gain as markets reopened after a weeklong holiday to end 4.59 percent higher, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index dived 9.41 percent. Chinese National Development and Reform Commission Chairman Zheng Shanjie (鄭珊潔) said the government would frontload 100 billion yuan (US$14.2 billion) in spending from the government’s budget for next year in addition
Sales RecORD: Hon Hai’s consolidated sales rose by about 20 percent last quarter, while Largan, another Apple supplier, saw quarterly sales increase by 17 percent IPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) on Saturday reported its highest-ever quarterly sales for the third quarter on the back of solid global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) servers. Hon Hai, also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) globally, said it posted NT$1.85 trillion (US$57.93 billion) in consolidated sales in the July-to-September quarter, up 19.46 percent from the previous quarter and up 20.15 percent from a year earlier. The figure beat the previous third-quarter high of NT$1.74 trillion recorded in 2022, company data showed. Due to rising demand for AI, Hon Hai said its cloud and networking division enjoyed strong sales
Protectionism: US trade chief Katherine Tai said the hikes would help to counter unfair trade practices from China, while boosting domestic clean energy investments US Trade Representative Katherine Tai (戴琪) defended stiff tariff hikes against countries such as China, saying that paired with investment, they were a “legitimate and constructive” tool for reinvigorating domestic industries. Tai’s comments come a week after sharp tariff increases on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), EV batteries and solar cells took effect — with levies down the line on other products also recently finalized. The latest moves targeting US$18 billion in Chinese goods come weeks before next month’s US presidential election, with Democrats and Republicans pushing a hard line on China as competition between Washington and Beijing intensifies. In an interview on Thursday