Strip malls — once anchors of postwar North American suburban neighborhoods — are doomed, with thousands across Canada and the US already derelict and eyed by land developers.
However, at least one Canadian academic sees value in maintaining the ubiquitous local retailing plazas and has amassed proposals, such as adding community gardens or toboggan slides, or morphing them into giant bee hives or parking lots for food caravans.
“Strip malls were once the economic hubs of new suburbs,” said Rob Shields, a sociology professor at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, who received a government grant to rethink strip malls so that they can benefit the communities around them.
Photo: Bloomberg
For more than 50 years, retailers favored the rows of boxy single-story shops opening onto a common parking lot facing major roadways bringing commuters driving between their suburban homes and downtown workplaces.
However, they are losing favor because of rising fuel prices, traffic congestion and city planners’ demands to make cities denser as part of a drive for more “walkable” cities.
More than 11 percent of strip malls in North America are derelict, representing 28 million square meters of vacant retail space, according to the Washington-based Urban Land Institute.
The rest are arguably in decline.
City planners such as Winnipeg’s Jeff Palmer view strip malls as “retail relics.”
“They reflect a time and a place that is no longer environmentally sustainable or economically viable. They do nothing to add to the vibrancy of a neighborhood and they don’t encourage walking, communicating or socializing,” he said.
They once housed banks, dry cleaners, drugstores, post offices and video stores all in one convenient location.
However, retailing has changed. Video stores lost out to online downloading, while superstores now sell groceries as well as other goods and services all under one roof.
“If they’re going next door for a product or service, why not keep them in-house,” John Williams, a senior consultant with retail consulting firm JC Williams Group, said of superstores.
Developers, meanwhile, would rather build regional “power centers” — big strip malls that pack in more stores and two or three anchor tenants locked into 20-year leases providing more stable cash flows.
And owners increasingly view “not very pretty” strip malls as “superb redevelopment opportunities,” said Ed Sonshine, CEO of RioCan Real Estate, which owns more than 100 strip malls in Canada and the US.
Sonshine turned a 2,100m2 strip mall in Toronto into a seven-story condominium building with retail stores on the ground floor and three levels of underground parking.
The main argument for strip malls is that they allow some form of neighborhood retailing to survive, said Palmer, “so that we’re not all driving 5km to buy milk.”
Some have been transformed into restaurant plazas, which have proved to be popular. Food retailing is one of the few still strong segments in retailing.
Shields, along with cities researcher Merle Patchett, held a design contest to generate new ideas to transform others. The top entries from 11 countries, including Australia, Brazil, Egypt, Germany and Iran, are posted at www.strip-appeal.com.
“There’s still a demand for local retail services and these facilities are standing there and so the question is, how can they be reused to make suburbs more vibrant and more sustainable?” Shields said.
Many of the proposals were hashed out by the communities they seek to change. Shields plans to put on display the finalists at city halls, starting in Buffalo, New York, hoping to generate support for salvaging strip malls.
However, Sonshine offers a more sober view. Eventually all strip malls will be redeveloped, he says, “because the land will become too valuable and there is a natural limit to what retailers will pay in rent, whereas the redevelopment potential will keep growing.”
A finalist in Shields’ contest came to the same conclusion and urged stripping Buffalo’s Central Park Plaza for parts: 4,700 bricks, 12,500 concrete blocks, 1,000 ceiling tiles, 120 steel beams, 125 wood panels, 20 aluminum door and window frames, and 600 sheets of steel decking.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part