Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean said on Friday that US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan had become too political and should be replaced, broaching a subject on which his opponents have been largely silent.
"I think Alan Greenspan has become too political," Dean said in response to a question from the audience at a town hall meeting.
"If he lacks the political courage to criticize the [budget] deficits, if he was foolish enough -- and he's not a foolish man -- to support the outrageous tax cuts that George Bush put through, then he has become too political and we need a new chairman of the Federal Reserve," he added.
"Greenspan has been an excellent chief, and yet in the last couple of years, I've been deeply troubled by his willingness to accede to positions that I don't think are in the best interest of the country," Dean later told reporters.
"I'm troubled by his willingness to bend in political winds. That's something a Fed chief should never do."
Greenspan is highly regarded in financial markets and closely associated in the public's eye with the record 10-year US economic expansion that ended in early 2001.
Although Greenspan backed the notion of tax cuts in early 2001, he has consistently warned of the dangers of high budget deficits. He has also on numerous occasions voiced a preference for tax cuts over spending increases.
Many analysts believe Greenspan's tax-cut views helped US President George W. Bush win congressional approval for an initial tax reduction package totaling US$1.35 trillion over 10 years. In all, since taking office, Bush has won tax cuts that add up to some US$1.7 trillion.
The tax cuts -- which the administration is now pressing to make permanent -- and an economic slowdown helped fuel a record US$374 billion budget gap last year, or about 3.5 percent of US GDP, the highest proportion since 1993. The White House expects the deficit to hit about 4.5 percent of GDP this year.
In some ways, Dean's criticism is academic.
At a news conference in Nashua, New Hampshire, later on Friday, Dean explained he was not calling for Greenspan to be ousted before his term ended but that if he were elected president he would not reappoint him.
Under the law, he would not be able to reappoint Greenspan even if he wanted.
While Greenspan's term at the helm of the central bank expires on June 20, Bush said last April the 77-year-old chairman should get another four-year term and Greenspan said he would serve if nominated and confirmed by the Senate.
But even if Greenspan is renamed to the post this year, the winner of the November presidential election will almost certainly need to name a new chairman.
That is because Greenspan's separate term as a member of the Fed's board ends on Jan. 31, 2006, and he cannot be renominated since he would have already served the one full 14-year term permitted. When he first took office as Fed chairman in 1987, he filled an unexpired term, before being appointed to the full term.
Aides to Democratic presidential hopefuls Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and retired General Wesley Clark said their candidates would turn to someone like former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who served under President Bill Clinton, if faced with the task of naming the next Fed chief.
The campaigns of Dean's other major Democratic rivals -- Sens. John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina -- did not comment.
Dean, who pursued a short career on Wall Street before becoming a doctor, declined to offer any names but told reporters he would look for someone who had a resume like Greenspan's, or his predecessor at the Fed, Paul Volcker, if he were in a position to nominate Greenspan's replacement.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would