There's nothing particularly remarkable about Amway's newest store, which opened six weeks ago in the lobby of a cookie-cutter apartment block in this southern Chinese city. Except that it exists at all.
A few customers prowl the aisles, scooping up tubes of toothpaste and jars of protein powder. Above them, a flat-screen television offers perky testimonials about Amway's products. Fu Mingxia, the Chinese women's diving champion and an Amway spokeswoman, beams from posters on the walls.
Amway, the direct marketer based in Ada, Michigan, does not have stores in the US, Europe, Africa -- anywhere, in fact, other than China. Everywhere else, it relies solely on a vast army of independent distributors, who buy Amway's cosmetics and household products from the company and sell them door to door.
Why the difference? In 1998, Amway agreed to open dozens of stores here as part of a deal with Beijing that allowed it to keep doing business in China after the government had banned direct sales companies.
Amway executives describe the arrangement as a "revolutionary break with tradition."
But it was not so different from the bargains that other foreign companies struck with the Chinese in return for access to the world's most populous market. China, as old hands say, plays by its own rules.
Now, though, China has been accepted into the WTO. In signing a 900-page membership form at the organization's meeting in Doha, Qatar, last Sunday, the Chinese government has pledged to play by the world's rules. And even though Amway was starting to thrive under China's capricious rules, it, like all kinds of foreign companies doing business in China, is welcoming the change.
"We cannot afford any more sudden changes in policy, having invested so much," said Eva Cheng, the chief executive of Amway Greater China. "But I genuinely believe that China will commit to the rules. For the first time, we will be able to see transparent laws and regulations."
China's entry into the trade organization has thrown a spotlight on the opportunities for foreign companies once Beijing cuts import tariffs and lifts restrictions on outside ownership of Chinese assets.
Outsiders are also looking hungrily at China's state-owned companies, which have lucrative franchises in telecommunications, banking and other industries. China has promised to stop subsidizing these leviathans, and to open their monopolies to local and foreign competition.
Of all the benefits of China's membership, however, none may have a more immediate and lasting effect on foreign investors than the establishment of a more consistent code of commercial regulations.
To comply with the WTO, the Chinese government will have to pass hundreds of new laws on virtually every aspect of commerce. The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation has pledged to publish all of them, and says it will not enforce any law that is not published.
"That may sound obvious to us, but it has huge implications for companies in China," said Andrew Rothman, a strategist for CLSA Emerging Markets.
In addition to accepting substantially lower tariffs and quotas, China has agreed to set up a better legal system to resolve commercial disputes. That will reduce the danger for foreign companies of being blindsided by arbitrary government rulings or policy reversals.
UNPRECEDENTED PACE: Micron Technology has announced plans to expand manufacturing capabilities with the acquisition of a new chip plant in Miaoli Micron Technology Inc unveiled a newly acquired chip plant in Miaoli County yesterday, as the company expands capacity to meet growing demand for advanced DRAM chips, including high-bandwidth memory chips amid the artificial intelligence boom. The plant in Miaoli County’s Tongluo Township (銅鑼), which Micron acquired from Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (力積電) for US$1.8 billion, is expected to make a sizeable capacity contribution to the company from fiscal 2028, the company said in a statement. It would be an extended production site of Micron’s large-scale manufacturing hub in Taichung, the company said. As the global semiconductor industry is racing to reach US$1 trillion
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings Ltd has applied for regulatory approval to acquire the Taiwan operations of Germany-based Delivery Hero SE's Foodpanda in a deal valued at about US$600 million. Grab submitted the filing to the Fair Trade Commission on Friday last week, with the transaction subject to regulatory review and approval, the company said in a statement yesterday. Its independent governance structure would help foster a healthy and competitive market in Taiwan if the deal is approved, Grab said. Grab, which is listed on the NASDAQ, said in the filing that US-based Uber Technologies Inc holds about 13 percent of
ABOVE LEGAL REQUIREMENT: The Ministry of Economic Affairs is prepared if LNG supply is disrupted, with more than the legal requirement of 11 days of inventory Taiwan has largely secured liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies through May and arranged about half of June’s supply, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday. Since the Middle East conflict began on Feb. 28, Taiwan’s LNG inventories have remained more than 12 days, exceeding the legal requirement of 11 days, indicating no major supply concerns for domestic gas and electricity, Kung said at a meeting of the legislature’s Economics Committee in Taipei. The ministry aims to increase the figure to 14 days by the end of next year, he said. While one or two LNG or crude oil shipments for May
Taiwan’s food delivery market could undergo a major shift if Singapore-based Grab Holdings Ltd completes its planned acquisition of Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda business in Taiwan, industry experts said. Grab on Monday last week announced it would acquire Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations for US$600 million. The deal is expected to be finalized in the second half of this year, with Grab aiming to complete user migration to its platform by the first half of next year. A duopoly between Uber Eats and Foodpanda dominates Taiwan’s delivery market, a structure that has remained intact since the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) blocked Uber Technologies Inc’s