Japan's US$2 billion deal to develop an Iranian oilfield is causing friction with the US, but Washington's key Asian ally is betting its staunch support on other security issues will limit any impact on bilateral ties.
Japan, which relies on the Middle East for almost all its oil, has been juggling its desire to develop Iran's Azadegan oil field with pressure from the US to back off because of concerns that Tehran is developing nuclear weapons.
Washington was quick to express its "disappointment" that the controversial deal had gone ahead, but Japanese government officials said yesterday the US reaction came as no surprise.
"We hadn't expected the United States to say `well done' about this agreement. But we had explained our national situation -- that Japan has to secure stable energy," said Tetsuhiro Hosono, an official at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi probably calculated that his close ties with US President George W. Bush and his decision to send troops to Iraq despite voter opposition had won him leeway to act on the deal with Japan's third-largest oil supplier, diplomatic analysts said.
Koizumi last month began deploying troops to help rebuild Iraq in Japan's biggest and riskiest overseas mission since World War II, involving some 1,000 personnel.
"Clearly, Japan's action in this matter is not based on distancing itself from the alliance," said Tokyo University political scientist Takashi Inoguchi.
"They are saying that this range of freedom should be allowed given their commitment and loyalty to the United States," he said. "I think the Japanese calculation may be correct, but we don't know how the action will impact the alliance."
Japan's top government spokesman, Yasuo Fukuda, welcomed the signing of the contract, which capped four years of tough negotiations and reinvigorated Iran's drive for investment.
"I think it is good if this leads to a stable energy supply, Fukuda told a news conference.
He added that Japan was well aware of US concerns and would keep urging Iran to abide by resolutions of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Iran has consistently denied seeking to build nuclear weapons and agreed last October to allow snap inspections of its atomic facilities and to halt temporarily uranium enrichment.
How much friction develops between the US and Japan will likely depend on Iran's actions on the nuclear front.
If Iran resumes uranium enrichment, the US "may need to put pressure on Iran and if Japan is providing resources, that could be a problem," said US political scientist Joseph Nye. "Bush would probably want to draw down political credits with Koizumi and there could be some friction."
Nye, dean of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, added: "It's not a cause for divorce, but it's a cause for a dispute within the family."
Asked by reporters how Japan would respond if Iran did not keep its nuclear promises, Vice Trade Minister Seiji Murata said: "We would have to deal with that on a case-by-case basis."
Tokyo's pledge to keep pressing Iran to live up to its IAEA commitments could weigh in its favor when Washington considered whether to implement the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, designed to discourage non-US firms from investing in those countries, analysts said.
The US has never tried to implement the law.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions
The Ministry of Economic Affairs said it plans to revise the export control list for strategic high-tech products by adding 18 items under three categories — advanced 3D printing equipment, advanced semiconductor equipment and quantum computers — which would require local manufacturers to obtain licenses for their export. The ministry’s announcement yesterday came as the International Trade Administration issued a 60-day preview period for planned revisions to the Export Control List for Dual Use Items and Technology (軍商兩用貨品及技術出口管制清單) and the Common Military List (一般軍用貨品清單), which fall under regulations governing export destinations for strategic high-tech commodities and specific strategic high-tech commodities. The
RSS