One in four younger US Muslims say suicide bombings to defend their religion are acceptable at least in some circumstances, though most Muslim-Americans overwhelmingly reject the tactic and are critical of Islamic extremism and al-Qaeda, a poll says.
The survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, one of the most exhaustive ever of the country's Muslims, revealed a community that in many ways blends comfortably into society. Its largely mainstream members express nearly as much happiness with their lives and communities as the general public does, show a broad willingness to adopt US customs, and have income and education levels similar to others in the US.
Even so, the survey revealed noteworthy pockets of discontent.
While nearly 80 percent of US Muslims said suicide bombings of civilians to defend Islam cannot be justified, 13 percent said they can be at least rarely justified.
That sentiment is strongest among those younger than 30. Two percent of them said it can often be justified, 13 percent said sometimes and 11 percent said rarely.
"It is a hair-raising number," said Radwan Masmoudi, president of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, which promotes the compatibility of Islam with democracy.
Andrew Kohut, Pew director, called support for the attacks "one of the few trouble spots" in the survey.
The question did not specify where a suicide attack might occur, who might carry it out or what was meant by using a bombing to "defend Islam."
Masmoudi said most supporters of the attacks likely assumed the context was a fight against occupation, -- a term often used to describe the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
US Muslims have growing Internet and television access to extreme ideologies, he said, adding: "People, especially younger people, are susceptible to these ideas."
Federal officials have warned that the US must be on guard against homegrown terrorism, as the British suffered with the London transit bombings of 2005.
Even so, US Muslims are far less accepting of suicide attacks than Muslims in many other nations. In surveys Pew conducted last year, support in some Muslim countries exceeded 50 percent, while it was considered justifiable by about one in four Muslims in Britain and Spain, and one in three in France.
"We have crazies just like other faiths have them," said Eide Alawan, who directs interfaith outreach at the Islamic Center of America in Michigan, one of the nation's largest mosques.
He said killing innocent people contradicts Islam.
In other findings, 5 percent of US Muslims expressed favorable views of the terrorist group al-Qaeda. One-fourth did not express an opinion.
Six in 10 said they were concerned about a rise in Islamic extremism in the US, while three in four expressed similar worries about extremism around the world.
One in four considered the US fight against terrorism a sincere attempt to curtail international terror. Only 40 percent said they believed Arab men carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
By six to one, respondents said the US was wrong to invade Iraq, while a third said the same about Afghanistan -- far deeper than the opposition expressed by the general US public.
Just over half said it has been harder being a US Muslim since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, especially the better educated, better paid, more religious and young. Nearly a third of those who flew in the past year said they had undergone extra screening because they are Muslim.
The survey estimates there are approximately 2.35 million Muslim-Americans. It found that among adults, two-thirds are from abroad while a fifth are US-born blacks.
By law, the Census Bureau does not ask about a person's religion.
Telephone interviews were conducted with 1,050 Muslim adults from January through last month.
DOUBLE-MURDER CASE: The officer told the dispatcher he would check the locations of the callers, but instead headed to a pizzeria, remaining there for about an hour A New Jersey officer has been charged with misconduct after prosecutors said he did not quickly respond to and properly investigate reports of a shooting that turned out to be a double murder, instead allegedly stopping at an ATM and pizzeria. Franklin Township Police Sergeant Kevin Bollaro was the on-duty officer on the evening of Aug. 1, when police received 911 calls reporting gunshots and screaming in Pittstown, about 96km from Manhattan in central New Jersey, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Renee Robeson’s office said. However, rather than responding immediately, prosecutors said GPS data and surveillance video showed Bollaro drove about 3km
‘MOTHER’ OF THAILAND: In her glamorous heyday in the 1960s, former Thai queen Sirikit mingled with US presidents and superstars such as Elvis Presley The year-long funeral ceremony of former Thai queen Sirikit started yesterday, with grieving royalists set to salute the procession bringing her body to lie in state at Bangkok’s Grand Palace. Members of the royal family are venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures, and lavished with glowing media coverage and gold-adorned portraits hanging in public spaces and private homes nationwide. Sirikit, the mother of Thai King Vajiralongkorn and widow of the nation’s longest-reigning monarch, died late on Friday at the age of 93. Black-and-white tributes to the royal matriarch are being beamed onto towering digital advertizing billboards, on
Tens of thousands of people on Saturday took to the streets of Spain’s eastern city of Valencia to mark the first anniversary of floods that killed 229 people and to denounce the handling of the disaster. Demonstrators, many carrying photos of the victims, called on regional government head Carlos Mazon to resign over what they said was the slow response to one of Europe’s deadliest natural disasters in decades. “People are still really angry,” said Rosa Cerros, a 42-year-old government worker who took part with her husband and two young daughters. “Why weren’t people evacuated? Its incomprehensible,” she said. Mazon’s
POWER ABUSE WORRY: Some people warned that the broad language of the treaty could lead to overreach by authorities and enable the repression of government critics Countries signed their first UN treaty targeting cybercrime in Hanoi yesterday, despite opposition from an unlikely band of tech companies and rights groups warning of expanded state surveillance. The new global legal framework aims to bolster international cooperation to fight digital crimes, from child pornography to transnational cyberscams and money laundering. More than 60 countries signed the declaration, which means it would go into force once ratified by those states. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the signing as an “important milestone,” and that it was “only the beginning.” “Every day, sophisticated scams destroy families, steal migrants and drain billions of dollars from our economy...