Howard Dean, the Democratic Party chairman, said on Sunday that US Vice President Dick Cheney would need to resign if he had ordered a leak that resulted in the public exposure of an undercover CIA officer.
Dean cited news reports last week that Lewis Libby, Cheney's former chief of staff, had testified to a grand jury that his "superiors," whom he did not name, had told him to leak classified information to reporters to justify the Iraq war.
But Libby's testimony, according to the document that was the basis of the news reports, did not say anyone had told him to disclose the name of Valerie Wilson, the undercover operative, as Dean appeared to suggest. The testimony dealt with a different but related disclosure of classified information from a report about Iraq's nuclear capability.
In an interview on the CBS News program Face the Nation, Dean appeared to expand on the news reports about Libby's testimony, saying grand jury testimony showed that "it turns out that the vice president of the United States may have been responsible for those leaks" about Wilson's role with the CIA for political reasons.
Any confusion on Dean's part about last week's disclosure underlines both the deep complexity of the investigation into who leaked Wilson's identity to the press and its potential for enormous political opportunities and pitfalls.
There are two reasons the confusion is likely to continue as a criminal case against Libby goes forward. The first is that Libby is not charged with improperly disclosing Wilson's identity in the summer of 2003; rather, he is charged with lying to investigators about how he learned of her position at the agency and her role in it assigning her husband, Joseph Wilson IV, to go to Africa to determine if Iraq was trying to acquire nuclear materials.
Joseph Wilson accused the administration of twisting intelligence about Iraq's nuclear capabilities, and days later, his wife's cover was blown in a column by Robert Novak in July 2003.
Joseph Wilson has asserted that his wife's identity was exposed in retaliation for his public criticism.
The second troublesome dimension is that the issue deals with the unacknowledged but frequent practice of government officials selectively leaking classified information to journalists. Although such leaks are forbidden by law, there is widespread recognition that it is done.
The document disclosed last Thursday, a prosecutor's letter to Libby's lawyers, shows that Libby had told the grand jury he was engaging in just such a practice.
The document said he told the grand jury that his superiors had authorized him to share with reporters information from a National Intelligence Estimate in June and July 2003. The intelligence estimate, a classified report about Iraq's nuclear capability, was used to rebut growing public concern about the rationale for invading Iraq.
The letter from the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, was disclosed in a filing by Libby's lawyers.
Fitzgerald said in the letter that he was going to use the testimony to show that Libby was directly engaged in the Bush administration effort to discredit its critics by conferring with reporters.
The letter said Libby testified that he spoke with reporters about the "NIE," as the intelligence estimate is called.
"We also note that it is our understanding that Mr. Libby testified that he was authorized to disclose information about the NIE to the press by his superiors," Fitzgerald said.
Fitzgerald also wrote that Libby discussed the contents of the classified report in a July 8 meeting -- 10 days before much of it was declassified -- with Judith Miller, then a reporter at The New York Times. Miller, who spent 85 days in jail before agreeing to testify in the leak case, has told the grand jury that Libby told her about Valerie Wilson at the same meeting.
The disclosure of portions of the intelligence estimate before it was declassified -- even if it did not deal with Valerie Wilson -- produced other criticism.
Senator Jack Reed described more precisely than did Dean the nature of last week's news reports in an appearance on Fox News Sunday.
"I think it's inappropriate. I think it's wrong," Reed said.
He added that the disclosure of the intelligence report should be part of Fitzgerald's investigation.
A feud has broken out between the top leaders of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party on whether to maintain close ties with Russia. The AfD leader Alice Weidel this week slammed planned visits to Russia by some party lawmakers, while coleader Tino Chrupalla voiced a defense of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The unusual split comes at a time when mainstream politicians have accused the anti-immigration AfD of acting as stooges for the Kremlin and even spying for Russia. The row has also erupted in a year in which the AfD is flying high, often polling above the record 20 percent it
Ecuadorans are today to vote on whether to allow the return of foreign military bases and the drafting of a new constitution that could give the country’s president more power. Voters are to decide on the presence of foreign military bases, which have been banned on Ecuadoran soil since 2008. A “yes” vote would likely bring the return of the US military to the Manta air base on the Pacific coast — once a hub for US anti-drug operations. Other questions concern ending public funding for political parties, reducing the number of lawmakers and creating an elected body that would
The latest batch from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s e-mails illustrates the extraordinary scope of his contacts with powerful people, ranging from a top Trump adviser to Britain’s ex-prince Andrew. The US House of Representatives is expected to vote this week on trying to force release of evidence gathered on Epstein by law enforcement over the years — including the identities of the men suspected of participating in his alleged sex trafficking ring. However, a slew of e-mails released this week have already opened new windows to the extent of Epstein’s network. These include multiple references to US President Donald
CHARGES: The former president, who maintains his innocence, was sentenced to 27 years and three months in prison for a failed coup bid, as well as an assassination plot Far-right former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro is running out of options to avoid prison, after judges on Friday rejected his appeal against a 27-year sentence for a botched coup bid. Bolsonaro lost the 2022 elections and was convicted in September for his efforts to prevent Brazlian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva from taking power after the polls. Prosecutors said the scheme — which included plans to assassinate Lula and a top Brazilian Supreme Court judge — failed only due to a lack of support from military top brass. A panel of Supreme Court judges weighing Bolsonaro’s appeal all voted to uphold