Fri, May 13, 2016 - Page 4 News List

Supreme Prosecutors’ Office defends swift execution of Taipei metro killer

By Jason Pan  /  Staff reporter

The judiciary followed proper procedure and defense lawyers filing an extraordinary appeal cannot be the basis for suspending procedures to carry out a death sentence, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office said yesterday in response to controversy surrounding the execution of convicted Taipei MRT killer Cheng Chieh (鄭捷).

Cheng’s lawyers, Liang Chia-ying (梁家贏), Huang Chih-hao (黃致豪) and Lin Chun-hung (林俊宏), tried to win a last-minute reprieve for their client by submitting an extraordinary appeal to the prosecutor-general on Tuesday night, seeking a stay of execution.

However, the document arrived at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office at 9pm, 13 minutes after Cheng’s execution, with the first gunshot fired by the executioner at 8:47pm.

The defense lawyers said in a statement that the judiciary had violated judicial procedure throughout the case and kept the decision to order Cheng’s execution secret, adding that they were in the process of filing for an extraordinary appeal, seeking a retrial and wanted a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices.

“The Ministry of Justice carried out the execution swiftly and did not contact the family of the accused or defense lawyers. This resulted in the accused not having sufficient time to allow the defense to initiate ‘criminal special aid procedures,’ and this is a deprivation of the accused right to life. It has violated international human rights conventions, and we regret what has taken place,” the lawyers said.

The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office said the proper judicial procedures for carrying out capital punishment had been followed and cited a need to maintain secrecy upon approval of an execution order.

It said that there are no legal requirements to contact the prisoner’s family, or defense lawyers prior to an execution.

“Even if the extraordinary appeal was submitted before carrying out the execution, according to The Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法), it cannot serve as the basis to suspend the said procedure,” it said.

Cheng left a will for his family, written after the Supreme Court’s final verdict on April 22 upholding four death sentences.

He also reportedly wrote a short apology to his family.

The EU yesterday issued a statement urging the government to introduce an immediate moratorium on the death penalty following Cheng’s execution. Saying that it recognizes the serious nature of the crimes and expresses sympathy to all those who suffered, it added that the “death penalty can never be justified as it has no deterrent effect ... [the EU] calls for its universal abolition.”

Additional reporting by Stacy Hsu

This story has been viewed 2044 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top