A senior White House official on Friday reiterated US calls for China to show flexibility in its relations with Taiwan, but did not comment on the latest remarks by Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅), which were seen by some in Taiwan as conciliatory.
“We repeatedly encourage our friends in Beijing to show flexibility and creativity in cross-strait relations going forward,” US National Security Council Senior Director for Asian Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink said. “I’m hopeful that will continue.”
However, he said that he was not aware of what Wang had said.
Kritenbrink was responding to Taiwanese reporters’ questions after Wang referred to the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution and said that China hopes president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would stick to the Constitution, something she has pledged to do.
“She was elected on the basis of the current Constitution of Taiwan, which recognizes China and Taiwan are one,” Wang said earlier in the week during a visit to Washington.
“It would be difficult to imagine that someone who is elected on the basis of that Constitution should try to do anything in violation of the Constitution,” he said.
In addition to a rare reference to the ROC Constitution, Wang’s remarks were seen as conciliatory, primarily because he did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
In 2006, former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted he made up the term “1992 consensus” in 2000.
Tsai has refused to adopt the formula, but has instead promised to maintain the “status quo” under the framework of the ROC Constitution and not to provoke Beijing.
The MAC on Friday said that it welcomed Bejing’s move to face the ROC Constitution in a practical manner.
However, the MAC emphasized that the Taiwanese government has never accepted Beijing’s version of the “one China” principle.
Former MAC chief Tung Chen-yuan (童振源) said Wang’s comments indicated that Beijing is adjusting its attitude, no longer insisting on the term “1992 consensus,” and is willing to establish a new basis for cross-strait political interaction with the newly-elected government.
Former deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) yesterday said that Wang’s remarks about the ROC Constitution were “a friendly move.”
“The ROC Constitution is the ‘one China’ principle, which is the gist of the ‘1992 consensus,’” she said.
Hung called on Tsai to abide by the ROC Constitutional framework and warned her against using the Constitution as a guise for stances such as “the ROC is Taiwan,” “the ROC on Taiwan” or “the ROC is Taiwan, Penghu, Kimen and Matsu,” which are all against the Constitution, Hung said.
‘VIRUS DIPLOMACY’: The nation’s expertise in handling COVID-19 was among the reasons that it should not be excluded from the WHO, the European Parliament said The European Parliament this week passed resolutions that support Taiwan’s bid to participate in the WHO and its intention to negotiate a trade pact with Taiwan. During its plenary session from Monday to Thursday, the parliament approved resolutions on the foreign policy consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak and the EU’s trade policy, parts of which were viewed as friendly toward Taiwan by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In a statement yesterday, the ministry welcomed the passage of the resolutions and thanked the parliament for its support for Taiwan. In the first resolution, the parliament cited Beijing’s increasing threats to Taiwan, the crackdown on
The gig began with a nun chanting on stage, but suddenly erupted into a wall of noise unleashed by distorted guitars and screamed sutras — the unique sound of Taiwan’s first Buddhist death metal band. The nation has a vibrant metal scene, but few outfits are quite as eye-catching as Dharma (達摩樂隊), a band that aims to deliver enlightenment via the medium of throaty eight-string guitars and guttural roars. Dressed in robes — black, of course — they use traditional Sanskrit sutras as lyrics, but everything else screams death metal, from bloody face paint on stage to growled vocals, relentless riffs and
LOOPHOLES: The people behind biased media content produced by a Chinese network, likely without sending staff to Taiwan, remain anonymous, a source said Beijing’s latest attempt at psychological warfare through heavily biased online media is aimed at sowing discord and polarizing Taiwanese society, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said. The council’s comment came in response to Chinese network Southeast Television, which late last month began broadcasting an online program featuring commentary by Taiwanese unification supporters that authorities suspect was filmed illegally in Taiwan. To circumvent cross-strait regulations, the broadcaster collaborated with online service provider Baidu to air the series titles Diverse Voices From the Taiwan Strait (台海百家說). Only Taiwanese are shown on camera, without revealing the host, interviewer or production team. In one video, political commentator and
SUPPRESSION: Michael Tsai, a former defense minister, said that Beijing’s list of Taiwan independence advocates contravenes the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights The best way to respond to threats from China against Taiwan independence advocates is for the president to publicly reiterate Taiwan’s sovereignty, former minister of national defense Michael Tsai (蔡明憲) said on Sunday. Chinese media on Nov. 15 said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was compiling “a list of stubborn Taiwanese separatists and will severely punish them in accordance with [China’s] Anti-Secession Law and hold them accountable for their actions for the rest of their lives.” Chinese media subsequently accused Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) of being a “first-rate war criminal,” because of his policy on mask exports. “The vast majority