Former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has agreed to join the party’s China Affairs Committee, while former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has turned down the same offer as the DPP’s search for members of the controversial committee continued.
In a press release issued late on Thursday, Tsai accepted the invitation extended by DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), who is to be the committee’s convener, to serve as one of the committee members.
“I’m willing to collaborate [with the committee] on everything that benefits the development of the party and consensus-forming in the DPP’s China policy,” Tsai said in the press release.
Meanwhile, Hsieh has turned down Su’s offer, said Lin Yao-wen (林耀文), director of Hsieh’s office.
Lin quoted Hsieh as saying that the former premier wanted to “leave room for others, given that the number of committee members was limited and the committee appeared to be nominal.”
The former premier, who went on a landmark visit to China last month which was received with mixed reviews, and was said to be interested in chairing the committee, appeared to be disappointed that he was not appointed convener when Su announced the official establishment of the committee on Wednesday.
Under Su’s plan, the committee would consist of seven to nine members and include an advisory board, with a meeting scheduled to be held every two months.
Hsieh was keen on being appointed frontman of the party in its exchange and engagement with Beijing, after becoming the most prominent DPP politician to visit China and submitting his initiative of “constitutions with different interpretations” (憲法各表) during the trip.
However, the committee, which was planned to be a decision-making platform on the DPP’s engagement with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), turned out to be not as aggressive and has upset many DPP members, including Hsieh.
According to DPP Secretary-General Lin Hsi-yao (林錫耀), the committee would now serve as an internal consensus-building platform with members of “accredited seniority.”
Su yesterday in Hualien said that he would continue his search for committee members and would provide further details when the roster is complete.
Other than Su and Tsai, possible candidates for the committee could include former premier Yu Shyi-kun (游錫堃), Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊), Greater Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德), DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), former National Security Council secretary-general Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) and former DPP secretary-general Wu Nai-jen (吳乃仁).
Yu, who voiced his opposition against the establishment of the committee, had been invited by Su and “could accept the offer,” according to Yu’s office director Super Meng (孟義超).
The committee’s design and makeup received mixed reviews from DPP politicians, with DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) saying he recognized the committee’s “balance of power” between factions.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said he had hoped the committee would include more young DPP members who could promote innovative ideas, instead of “a roster of senior politicians which looked almost identical to the Central Standing Committee.”
Hung Chih-kun (洪智坤), a member of the Central Executive Committee, argued that Chinese dissidents, China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and academics from various think tanks should be included in the committee, as opposed to more senior politicians, because the committee is established with the goal of improving understanding about China.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS