A US military expert has written that if Chinese and Japanese forces met in battle over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), the outcome would be difficult to predict.
“Such a fight appeared farfetched before 2010, when Japan’s Coast Guard apprehended Chinese fishermen who rammed one of its vessels off the disputed islands, but it appears more likely now,” James Holmes, an associate professor of strategy at the US Naval War College, wrote in Foreign Policy magazine this week.
Holmes said that China’s leaders are “clearly thinking about the unthinkable.”
However, Japan would not be a pushover, he wrote.
He said the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) has accumulated several pockets of material excellence, such as undersea warfare, and their sailors were renowned for their professionalism.
“If commanders manage their human, material and geographic advantages artfully, Tokyo could make a maritime war with China a close-run thing — and perhaps even prevail,” Holmes wrote.
He said a straightforward China-on-Japan war was doubtful unless Beijing managed to isolate Tokyo diplomatically or Tokyo isolated itself through “foolish diplomacy.”
Barring that, Holmes said a conflict would probably ensnare the US as an active combatant on the Japanese side.
However, discounting politics, a contest between Chinese and Japanese sea power would be no contest in purely numerical terms.
Japan has 48 major surface combatant ships, including light aircraft carriers, guided-missile destroyers, frigates and corvettes and 16 diesel-electric submarines.
The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) boasts 73 major surface combatants, 84 missile-firing patrol craft and 63 submarines.
“China’s navy is far superior in sheer weight of steel,” Holmes wrote.
However, the PLAN is untested and its quality unsure.
The quality of the JMSDF’s Navy and its human capabilities “could partially or wholly offset the PLA’s advantage of numbers.”
“JMSDF flotillas ply Asian waters continually, operating solo or with other navies. The PLA Navy is inert by comparison,” he wrote.
He said that in general, Chinese fleets emerge only for brief cruises or exercises, leaving crews little time to develop an operating rhythm or learn their profession.
The human edge goes to Japan.
Because China and Japan are close to each other, both countries’ land-based firepower needs to be factored in, Holmes said.
PLA conventional ballistic missiles could strike land sites throughout Asia, putting Japanese assets at risk before they ever left port or took to the sky.
China’s Second Artillery Corps, or missile force, has reportedly fielded anti-ship ballistic missiles able to strike moving ships at sea from China.
However, if Japan forward-deployed Type 88 ASCMs — mobile, easily transportable anti-ship weapons — and missile crews to the islets and to neighboring islands in the Ryukyu chain, its ground troops could generate overlapping fields of fire that would “convert nearby seas into no-go zones for Chinese shipping.”
Holmes concluded that whoever best combined sea, land and air forces stood a good chance of winning a conflict.
“That could be Japan if its political and military leaders think creatively, procure the right hardware and arrange it on the map for maximum effect,” he wrote.
Holmes said Japan would not need to defeat China’s military to win a showdown at sea because it already holds the “contested real estate.”
“If Northeast Asian seas became a no-man’s land, but Japanese forces hung on, the political victory would be Tokyo’s,” he says.
Finally, Holmes said that if China lost much of its fleet in a Sino-Japanese clash — even in a winning effort — Beijing could see its momentum toward world-power status “reversed in an afternoon.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by