Officials and academics yesterday offered different interpretations of the differences between the recent US-China joint statement and the one signed in 2009 and whether the US supported China’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan.
The 2009 joint statement said: “The two sides agreed that respecting each other’s core interests is extremely important to ensure steady progress in US-China relations.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) yesterday was happy that the latest joint statement failed to mention China’s “core interests.”
“You can see that the ‘core interests’ mentioned last time was neither included in the joint statement this time, nor was it mentioned in the joint press conference, meaning the US disagrees with mainland China in this regard,” Yang said.
Yang said that the ministry lobbied against the mention of “core interests” in the summit between US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) during a recent series of briefings by US officials prior to the Obama-Hu meeting.
Obama was criticized by pro-Taiwan academics for kowtowing to China in his visit to Beijing in 2009, mainly because of that joint statement.
Since then, the 2009 joint statement has been used by Chinese officials on several occasions as proof of US support for its claim to sovereignty over Taiwan.
The Democratic Progressive Party has urged the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government to take issue with the US over the matter, while the government accepted the clarification later made by American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Burghardt that the US government only accepted Beijing’s sovereignty over Tibet and Xinjiang, not Taiwan.
Yang said that the incorporation in the latest joint statement of the wording: “The two sides reaffirmed respect for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” was not a reference to Taiwan, as “it was in the second paragraph, not the sixth where the Taiwan issue was addressed.”
Yang said the KMT government believed the US stance on Taiwan’s sovereignty remained unchanged as “every time when the US mentions the ‘one China’ policy, it refers to the US’ one ‘China policy’ or ‘its one China policy,’ which is different to China’s ‘one China’ principle.”
A day after meeting with Obama at a luncheon with senior US officials and business leaders, Hu said on Thursday that “Taiwan and Tibet concern China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and represent China’s core interests,” and expressed the hope that the US would honor its commitment to maintain the hard-earned relationships.
That the term “core interest” -appeared in Hu’s speech and not in the joint statement meant that it was an issue on which China and the US were divided, an anonymous foreign ministry official said yesterday.
“It would have been included in the joint statement if the US agreed,” the official said.
However, Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), an associate professor of politics at Soochow University, disagreed.
The absence of the term “core interests” in the latest statement did not mean that the US had changed its position on China’s core interests, because the recent joint statement clearly stated that “the Presidents further reaffirmed their commitment to the November 2009 US-China Joint Statement,” Lo said.
“Once the 2009 joint statement was reiterated, there was accordingly no need to mention ‘core interests’ again. More importantly, since the 2009 joint statement was made the US has not refuted the claim by China that it considered Taiwan a core interest,“ Lo said.
Since November 2009, China has expanded the content of its “core interests,” not defined in the 2009 joint statement, by declaring the South China Sea, the Yellow Sea and Taiwan as its core interests on a par with Tibet and Xinjiang on various occasions, Lo said.
“What China wanted from the US was a promise to respect its ‘core interests.’ After getting that endorsement, China has its own interpretation of what ‘core interests’ means. This is China’s core interest ploy, and it’s a little concerning that the US has fallen into the trap,” Lo said.
Alex Huang (黃介正), an assistant professor at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies, held a different view, saying that the Taiwan issue was addressed in a “nicer” way than in the 2009 statement.
“It was more modest and we can feel the US government has taken note of our concerns since the last joint statement. The US government is sensitive to Taiwan’s concerns,” he said.
Beijing would surely have wanted the inclusion of “core interests” in the joint statement again, but the US clearly did not accept that demand, Huang said.
The military has spotted two Chinese warships operating in waters near Penghu County in the Taiwan Strait and sent its own naval and air forces to monitor the vessels, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said. Beijing sends warships and warplanes into the waters and skies around Taiwan on an almost daily basis, drawing condemnation from Taipei. While the ministry offers daily updates on the locations of Chinese military aircraft, it only rarely gives details of where Chinese warships are operating, generally only when it detects aircraft carriers, as happened last week. A Chinese destroyer and a frigate entered waters to the southwest
A magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck off the coast of Yilan County at 8:39pm tonight, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said, with no immediate reports of damage or injuries. The epicenter was 38.7km east-northeast of Yilan County Hall at a focal depth of 98.3km, the CWA’s Seismological Center said. The quake’s maximum intensity, which gauges the actual physical effect of a seismic event, was a level 4 on Taiwan’s 7-tier intensity scale, the center said. That intensity level was recorded in Yilan County’s Nanao Township (南澳), Hsinchu County’s Guansi Township (關西), Nantou County’s Hehuanshan (合歡山) and Hualien County’s Yanliao (鹽寮). An intensity of 3 was
Instead of focusing solely on the threat of a full-scale military invasion, the US and its allies must prepare for a potential Chinese “quarantine” of Taiwan enforced through customs inspections, Stanford University Hoover fellow Eyck Freymann said in a Foreign Affairs article published on Wednesday. China could use various “gray zone” tactics in “reconfiguring the regional and ultimately the global economic order without a war,” said Freymann, who is also a nonresident research fellow at the US Naval War College. China might seize control of Taiwan’s links to the outside world by requiring all flights and ships entering or leaving Taiwan
The next minimum wage hike is expected to exceed NT$30,000, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday during an award ceremony honoring “model workers,” including migrant workers, at the Presidential Office ahead of Workers’ Day today. Lai said he wished to thank the awardees on behalf of the nation and extend his most sincere respect for their hard work, on which Taiwan’s prosperity has been built. Lai specifically thanked 10 migrant workers selected for the award, saying that although they left their home countries to further their own goals, their efforts have benefited Taiwan as well. The nation’s industrial sector and small businesses lay
RSS