The legislature yesterday debated whether to legalize same-sex marriage or pass new partnership legislation during a second and final public hearing in Taipei, as thousands of same-sex marriage supporters rallied outside.
Thousands of protesters packed the section of Qingdao Road bordering the Legislative Yuan, waving rainbow flags and shouting rejections of any “discounting of human rights” as the hearing opened.
They demanded that amendments to the Civil Code be passed to include same-sex couples in the definition of a marriage rather than passing special legislation to grant partnership or marriage rights.
Photo: Lin Cheng-kung, Taipei Times
“Special legislation is just a political stalling tactic that refuses to treat homosexuals as ordinary people, providing a lower level of protection than amending the Civil Code,” said Tseng Chao-yuan (曾昭媛), a senior researcher at the Awakening Foundation. “A special law on this issue would be about treating us differently and giving us less, which is just discrimination.”
Only a handful of opponents of same-sex marriage gathered for a protest along Jinan Road, compared with the thousands who protested two weeks ago.
On Nov. 17, after a same-sex marriage bill passed the first reading, the legislative caucuses agreed to hold two public hearings before continuing deliberation of proposed amendments to the Civil Code, with both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) agreeing to complete the review by the end of the current legislative session.
Photo: David Chang, EPA
At the first hearing on Thursday, the idea of formulating a special law to legalize same-sex marriage was proposed.
Debates yesterday focused on the merits of Civil Code amendments versus the passage of a special law, with DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) and KMT caucus convener Sufin Siluko (廖國棟) having voiced support for special legislation at the first hearing.
“A homosexual partnership act would strike the best balance between guaranteeing rights and minimizing the shock to society,” lawyer Qiu Pei-en (裘佩恩) said, adding that passing a partnership law would allow time to assess the potential effects of amending the Civil Code.
Photo: David Chang, EPA
“The Civil Code is a basic law, and inserting homosexual marriage is a huge project that should be handled cautiously,” Qiu added.
“I originally thought this would be a small matter, because some homosexuals are essentially saying they are willing to accept legal restrictions,” said Chen Yi-chien (陳宜倩), a law professor affiliated with Shih Hsin University’s Graduate Institute for Gender Studies, referring to the Criminal Code’s ban on adultery.
Any explicitly same-sex partnership or marriage law would likely be subject to constitutional challenges for being “separate, but not equal,” she said, echoing several speakers who compared drafting a new law with racial discrimination.
“I do not know whether a special marriage law or revisions to the Civil Code would be better suited to stopping discrimination against homosexuals, but a partnership law would be worthless,” said Chen Si-hao (陳思豪), a Taiwanese Presbyterian Church minister.
“Jesus said that God gives sunlight and rain to both good and bad people, giving even unrighteous people basic grace,” he said.
Hsu Mu-yan (許牧彥), a professor of scientific management and intellectual property at National Chengchi University and a Taiwanese Presbyterian Church elder, said that marriage was intended to prevent children being born outside of wedlock, who could compete with legitimate children for family property rights.
“If you want to be required to be sexually faithful to each other, we are very welcoming, and that is why we are willing to support a special law to help stabilize your partnership. However, such a partnership is not a marriage because there is no way you can have children together,” Hsu said.
“The reason I do not have children is because I am a lesbian and our nation forbids artificial insemination for unmarried people. My right to give birth has been taken away from me because I cannot get married,” Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights secretary-general Chien Chih-chieh (簡至潔) said.
A separate partnership or marriage law could create legal difficulties for transgender people who were in a partnership or marriage before deciding to swap identities, she said.
DPP caucus chief executive Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said he was in favor of a same-sex marriage act instead of amendments to the Civil Code to allow the issue of blood relations between partners and their children to be addressed.
“If both partners are female, and one of them has a child, whether that child should be considered a blood relative of her partner or only a relative by marriage is a problem that needs to be addressed,” he said.
Additional reporting by CNA
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well
RSS