The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday said it would remove a controversial section of the parade to celebrate the presidential inauguration today, following criticism from social groups.
“The performance is meant to show that we were able to bid farewell to our authoritarian past and move on to democratization, because countless people made sacrifices. We cherish the history, and we have not forgotten these brave people,” DPP News and Information Department director and Presidential Office spokesman-designate Alex Huang (黃重諺) said. “We therefore planned to re-enact the history on inauguration day, to remind ourselves and remind everyone in this country that the democracy we enjoy today is the fruit of people’s efforts and struggles.”
Huang said the performance is to serve as a reminder to the new government that it should not disregard the public’s voice when in power.
Photo: CNA
However, following criticism by social campaigners, the DPP would only keep the parts celebrating democracy, while removing the part depicting social movements, Huang said.
Originally, the entire performance was to include people marching in front of the Presidential Office Building holding slogans from various social movements in recent years, such as the movement against forced expropriation and demolition of private homes in Dapu Borough (大埔) in Miaoli County’s Jhunan Township (竹南), as well as the anti-nuclear movement.
However, the skit triggered harsh criticism from social campaigners when it was shown during a public rehearsal on Wednesday, especially when a group of activists against the demolition of Huaguang Community (華光) in Taipei’s Daan District (大安) were dispersed by security personnel when they walked near the Presidential Office Building on their way to the Taiwan High Court, where they were facing prosecution for participating in a demonstration.
Amber Shyu (徐玉紅), a resident of Taoyuan’s Gueishan District (龜山) who had been fighting against the forced demolition of her family’s home for years, also criticized the skit.
“Many people who were involved in social movements, including myself, are still facing prosecution and have to appear in court on the inauguration day,” she said. “The performance is like rubbing salt into our wounds.”
Despite the DPP’s decision to withdraw the controversial skit, activists said the DPP’s handling of the issue showed its “arrogance.”
“Even if [the DPP] was willing to make revisions, it only did so because of the protests, which is ridiculous because we should not have to protest in the first place to remind the party not to be so presumptuous,” Alliance for Workers of Closed Factories member Lu Chyi-horng (盧其宏) said.
Lu also blasted the DPP for leaving in depictions of earlier democratization movements.
“There were many different groups involved in the dangwai [黨外, outside the party] movement, so how can the DPP as one party claim to represent Taiwan’s democratization process. This is just another form of arrogance,” Lu said.
About 30 protesters from the Workers’ Struggle Alliance, Taiwan Rural Front and other groups earlier yesterday gathered at the site of the inauguration ceremony in front of the Presidential Office Building, chanting that the “people’s struggle” is not a “circus” to be deployed by those in power.
They performed a skit showing president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and associates eating tofu stained with the blood of activists, playing off the Mandarin phrase “eating tofu” (吃豆腐), meaning to take advantage of others.
“We used our bodies to show the people how awful the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] was and now you’re stepping on us as you move up to take the presidency,” National Alliance for Workers of Closed Factories secretary-general Chen Hsiu-lian (陳秀蓮) said, adding that the DPP’s actions showed that Tsai was already “dizzy with power.”
Taiwan Rural Front researcher Hsu Po-jen (許博任), who is also Green Party Taiwan secretary-general, said it was “extremely painful” to see past slogans commandeered for the skit.
“The Tsai administration has taken what we have spilled blood and tears over to embellish her inauguration ceremony, but she has never made any promises over what policy or structural changes she would implement,” he said, adding that the DPP had failed to meaningfully support social movements during President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) eight years in office.
“The people’s struggle is not a prop — our blood and tears were not a show,” Taiwan Rural Front spokesperson Chen Ping-hsuan (陳平軒) said.
“We oppose arrogance in government — not just the KMT. If the DPP does not repent, it will be the next administration to be taken down,” he added.
Separately, former Presidential Office secretary-general Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭), whose husband Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) ran a series of dissident magazines and in 1989 self-immolated in protest against the then-KMT government’s restrictions on freedom of speech, said the decision to remove the controversial part is the reason people voted for Tsai.
“She listens to the people and makes changes when she realizes that she might have made a mistake,” Yeh said.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks
RSS