Senior Ting Hsin International Group (頂新集團) executive Wei Ying-chun (魏應充) was found guilty of defrauding consumers and breaching food safety laws and given a four-year jail term by the Taipei District Court in a first-round ruling yesterday.
The court also ordered Wei Chuan Foods Corp (味全食品), a subsidiary of Ting Hsin, to pay a NT$15.5 million (US$473,051) fine, while Wei Chuan Foods general manager Chang Chiao-hua (張教華) was found not guilty.
Chang was the only one of 13 defendants to escape punishment, with 11 other company employees, excluding Wei, found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from five months to 46 months, most of which can be commuted to fines.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
Wei’s lawyer Yu Ming-hsien (余明賢) said they would appeal his sentence.
“We regret this ruling and we cannot accept it... We believe Wei Chuan employees undertook their work by following the rules and did not break the law. We will appeal the ruling to fight for not-guilty rulings for Wei Chuan employees,” Yu said.
Legal professionals said Wei and his company got off lightly.
Lawyer Lin Chun-feng (林俊峰), a former prosecutor, said the court handed down light sentences to both Wei and Wei Chuan Foods for fraud and adulterating food products, which harmed people’s health.
Prosecution of the 2014 case involving tainted cooking oil was divided into two judicial cases, with yesterday’s ruling dealing with the firm’s plant-based oil products, while the Changhua District Court handled the case dealing with animal-based oil products.
The Changhua District Court’s not-guilty verdict handed down to Wei and five other defendants in November last year caused a public furor, while prosecutors have appealed that case to the Taiwan High Court.
Yesterday’s ruling said Wei Chuan Foods made illicit profits estimated at NT$209.73 million by mixing low-grade palm oil and other low-cost oils containing artificial coloring from supplier Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基), and after processing, marketed the products as high-grade olive oil and other expensive cooking oils.
Among the four Wei brothers who owned and managed Ting Hsin Group, Wei Ying-chun is the main figure embroiled in the scandal, as he headed the group’s food and oil product subsidiaries, having served as chairman of Wei Chuan Foods, Ting Hsin Oil and Fat Industrial Co (頂新製油實業) and Cheng I Food Co (正義股份).
Wei and 11 other defendants were found guilty of fraud, faking product labels and breaches of the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation (食品安全衛生管理法), according to yesterday’s ruling.
Among them: former Ting Hsin Oil and Fat general manager Chang Mei-femg (常梅峰) was handed a 46-month term; Chung Mei-yu (鍾美玉), former head of Wei Chuan’s research center, was sentenced to 22 months; Shih Chieh-jen (施介人), manager of Wei Chuan’s food and oil product research and development division, was given 27 months; and Chen Jung-hui (陳榮輝), deputy head of the company’s product testing and analysis division, was senteced to five months.
Wei Chuan Foods said it regretted the Taipei District Court’s ruling against the company and its employees.
“We will immediately seek to appeal the ruling made by the court and will file a lawsuit against Ting Hsin Oil and Fat Industrial Co to seek compensation,” the company said in a statement.
Additional reporting by Aileen Chuang
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is