Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration committed several fatal mistakes during Wang’s landmark visit to China, in particular the failure to reject the “one China” framework and China’s unilateral rhetoric of a consensus having been reached, the opposition parties said yesterday.
Wang returned to Taipei yesterday after a four-day trip to the Chinese cities of Nanjing and Shanghai, during which Taiwanese and Chinese government officials held historic, but “unofficial” direct talks for the first time in 65 years.
While the institutionalization of government-to-government talks and the bilateral engagement without preconditions are welcome, Wang made several mistakes that could jeopardize Taiwan’s future and the interests of Taiwanese in the future, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.
“It appears that the Ma administration has willingly accepted the ‘one China’ framework as defined by Beijing,” Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), executive director of the DPP’s Policy Research Committee, told a press conference in which the party submitted its “five viewpoints and three questions” to Wang.
Ma and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) both mentioned the “one China structure” and the so-called “‘1992 consensus’ under the one China principle” last year, Wu said.
Unsurprisingly, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) reiterated the “one China framework” after his meeting with Wang on Tuesday without being challenged by Wang and his ministry, he added.
Another concern was a discrepancy between the two sides’ post-meeting press conference, with Wang saying that a three-point consensus had been reached, while Zhang highlighted a five-point consensus, but the MAC has neither offered any explanation on the discrepancy nor challenged Beijing’s claim.
One of the Chinese-version consensuses hinted that the completion of follow-up agreements under the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement would be a prerequisite for Taiwan’s pursuit of accession to the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which means China would decide the outcome of Taiwan’s effort in seeking regional economic integration, Wu said.
Former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) raised similar concerns in a press release issued by her office yesterday, saying that Taiwan should have “three insistences” on cross-strait engagement.
Taiwan cannot fall into a “‘one-China’ framework” trap, because Beijing has never eased its oppression of Taiwan’s international space with that ideology, she said, adding that Taiwan also cannot echo Beijing’s interpretation of its sovereignty and should not be too cowardly to voice its own claim to sovereignty.
The cross-strait talks cannot be conducted to serve specific political agendas, nor should they only serve as an arrangement for specific government agencies, she said.
While the Wang-Zhang meeting and the officials’ addressing each other in their official capacities have won praise as historical achievements, Chinese media still refused to refer to Wang using his official title and did not mention the Republic of China at all, Tsai added.
Contrary to the analyses of most observers and international media, “the Taiwanese people’s anxiety over future cross-strait relations appears to have risen after the meeting,” she said.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union said Wang should report to the legislature about his trip, in particular his second, closed-door meeting with Zhang on Thursday night.
EFFICIENCY: The rules for Philippine arrivals were revised after 17.6% of arrivals with symptoms tested positive, compared with 0.7% of those with no symptoms Starting today, Chinese spouses who hold a reunion permit can apply to enter Taiwan and travelers without symptoms from the Philippines do not need to be tested for COVID-19 upon arrival, but are to be tested after a 14-day quarantine, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said yesterday. Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the center, said that from today, Chinese who are married to a Taiwanese citizen and hold a reunion permit can apply to the National Immigration Agency for entry into Taiwan. Chinese who are married to a foreign national and hold an accompanied reunion permit
PENGHU INSPECTION: Taiwan cannot let its enemies strut around in its airspace, Tsai said, one day after a Chinese spokesman denied a median line exists in the Taiwan Strait Following China’s assertion on Monday that there is no “median line” in the Taiwan Strait, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday pledged to defend the nation’s airspace during a visit to an air force base in Penghu, saying that Taiwan cannot allow others to flex their military muscle in its territorial airspace. Tsai praised the “heroic performance” of the pilots of the Indigenous Defense Fighters who have been intercepting Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force planes in recent days. “I have a lot of confidence in you. As soldiers of the Republic of China [ROC], how could we let enemies strut
CONSOLIDATION? Taiwan Thinktank deputy executive-general Doong Sy-chi said Beijing’s intimidation tactics are further alienating those who identify as Chinese Only 2 percent of respondents to a poll on constitutional amendments and national identity identified as Chinese, while 62.6 percent identified as Taiwanese, the Taiwan Thinktank said yesterday. Legislators have proposed amendments to the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文), which would change the definition of the nation’s territory, remove the Taiwan Provincial Government as an entity, prioritize the use of “Taiwan” for national groups at international events, and remove restrictions on defining the national emblem, national flag and national anthem. The poll showed that 80.5 percent of respondents agreed that the nation should participate as “Taiwan” at events organized by world
MISTAKE: The Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy is not a UN body, and the government is committed to protecting the nation’s name, Joseph Wu said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday condemned the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy for listing Taiwanese cities as belonging to China on its Web site, and asked that it correct the error. The organization was inaugurated in Brussels in 2016 as a global coalition of mayors committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Six Taiwanese cities at the time joined the coalition as cities in “Taiwan,” the ministry said. However, officials from the Kaohsiung City Government — one of the organization’s members — last week noticed that the city was now listed on the organization’s Web site as a