Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) announced yesterday that the party would be initiating a motion of no confidence against the Cabinet as early as today to “have the Taiwanese be the judges of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration with ballots in their hands.”
“We are initiating the proposal as a constitutional measure to counter the constitutional crisis created by Ma and to stabilize domestic politics... Since the people no longer trust the current administration, a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet is an inevitability,” Su told a press conference, held at the DPP headquarters to coincide with the national day ceremony.
More than 70 percent of the voters saw Ma and Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) as incompetent for lying, obstruction of justice and infringement of the Constitution during the ongoing political strife between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) which also involved wiretaps on the legislature, Su said.
Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times
The DPP legislative caucus is expected to propose a no-confidence vote in a Legislative Yuan plenary after collecting the signatures of more than 38 — one-third of the current 112 — lawmakers.
The Additional Articles of the Constitution stipulates that 72 hours after a no-confidence motion is made, an open-ballot vote must be taken within 48 hours. The motion is deemed passed if at least half the lawmakers vote for it, which means the DPP would need 57 votes for the motion to pass.
Controlling only 40 seats, the DPP would need votes from other opposition parties and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to pass the threshold. With the Taiwan Solidarity Union, the People First Party and at least one independent lawmaker lending support for a combined 46 or 47 votes, the DPP would need to pry away 10 or 11 votes from the KMT.
Several DPP members and political analysts observed that the action could paradoxically benefit Ma because the threshold is high and because no motion of no confidence could be proposed within a year if the current proposal fails.
Additionally, they observed that a successful vote, which would lead to dissolution of the legislature, would likely help Ma remove Wang from his position as speaker and control the KMT caucus.
However, Su appeared to be unfazed, reiterating that the motion was “the right thing to do” and saying that the party “was not giving up on other options” — impeachment and recall — as well.
Ma and Jiang lied to the Taiwanese, collaborated with judicial officials to remove the legislative speaker with information obtained by alleged illegal wiretapping and tried to infringe on legislative power, all of which could have led to their resignation in other democracies, Su said.
When the DPP could submit the proposal would be decided by the latest developments in the legislature, where the KMT caucus voided the agenda of the legislative plenaries today and on Tuesday. The date and meeting agenda of the next plenary is awaiting further party negotiations.
The DPP initiated a motion of no-confidence against former premier Sean Chen (陳?) in September last year. The party lost the vote, 66 to 46, but Chen was eventually replaced by Jiang in February.
The KMT yesterday slammed the DPP for filing its motion on Double Ten National Day, and criticized the party for boycotting Jiang’s report on the legislative floor.
Meanwhile, in response, the Presidential Office yesterday expressed regret over the DPP’s plan to initiate a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet, and urged the party to present solutions to foster political stability and economic growth instead.
Presidential Office spokesperson Lee Chia-fei (李佳霏) cited Ma’s National Day speech and said the government aimed to find viable ways forward for Taiwan by facilitating economic liberalization while raising the competitiveness of the service sector after the nation signed the cross-strait service trade agreement with China this year.
“The DPP should abandon its political manipulation and join the government to fight for the economy. This will be what the public really wants,” she said.
Separately yesterday, Wang said he respected the DPP’s right to initiate the motion, and said the legislature will handle the motion in accordance with standard procedures.
If the motion is filed, there will be a three-day “cooling off period” to allow the DPP to retrieve the motion. If the party insisted on initiating the motion, the legislature will hold a meeting to review the motion on the fourth day and vote on it on the fifth day, he said.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
RSS