Fri, Oct 11, 2013 - Page 1 News List

Su announces no confidence motion

By Chris Wang and Mo Yan-chih  /  Staff reporters

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Su Tseng-chang, center, accompanied by DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming, second left, and other members of the DPP caucus, holds a press conference at the party’s headquarters in Taipei yesterday, announcing the party’s intention to initiate a motion of no confidence against the Cabinet.

Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) announced yesterday that the party would be initiating a motion of no confidence against the Cabinet as early as today to “have the Taiwanese be the judges of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration with ballots in their hands.”

“We are initiating the proposal as a constitutional measure to counter the constitutional crisis created by Ma and to stabilize domestic politics... Since the people no longer trust the current administration, a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet is an inevitability,” Su told a press conference, held at the DPP headquarters to coincide with the national day ceremony.

More than 70 percent of the voters saw Ma and Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) as incompetent for lying, obstruction of justice and infringement of the Constitution during the ongoing political strife between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) which also involved wiretaps on the legislature, Su said.

The DPP legislative caucus is expected to propose a no-confidence vote in a Legislative Yuan plenary after collecting the signatures of more than 38 — one-third of the current 112 — lawmakers.

The Additional Articles of the Constitution stipulates that 72 hours after a no-confidence motion is made, an open-ballot vote must be taken within 48 hours. The motion is deemed passed if at least half the lawmakers vote for it, which means the DPP would need 57 votes for the motion to pass.

Controlling only 40 seats, the DPP would need votes from other opposition parties and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to pass the threshold. With the Taiwan Solidarity Union, the People First Party and at least one independent lawmaker lending support for a combined 46 or 47 votes, the DPP would need to pry away 10 or 11 votes from the KMT.

Several DPP members and political analysts observed that the action could paradoxically benefit Ma because the threshold is high and because no motion of no confidence could be proposed within a year if the current proposal fails.

Additionally, they observed that a successful vote, which would lead to dissolution of the legislature, would likely help Ma remove Wang from his position as speaker and control the KMT caucus.

However, Su appeared to be unfazed, reiterating that the motion was “the right thing to do” and saying that the party “was not giving up on other options” — impeachment and recall — as well.

Ma and Jiang lied to the Taiwanese, collaborated with judicial officials to remove the legislative speaker with information obtained by alleged illegal wiretapping and tried to infringe on legislative power, all of which could have led to their resignation in other democracies, Su said.

When the DPP could submit the proposal would be decided by the latest developments in the legislature, where the KMT caucus voided the agenda of the legislative plenaries today and on Tuesday. The date and meeting agenda of the next plenary is awaiting further party negotiations.

The DPP initiated a motion of no-confidence against former premier Sean Chen (陳?) in September last year. The party lost the vote, 66 to 46, but Chen was eventually replaced by Jiang in February.

The KMT yesterday slammed the DPP for filing its motion on Double Ten National Day, and criticized the party for boycotting Jiang’s report on the legislative floor.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top