Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan’s (連戰) recent comment to outgoing Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that “Taiwan is a troublemaker” drew criticism from opposition legislators yesterday.
In a meeting with Hu on Tuesday, Lien said that “for a long time internationally Taiwan has been [seen as] in truth a troublemaker.”
Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Hsu Chung-hsin (許忠信) yesterday said that Lien, having been minister of foreign affairs, premier and vice president, should know full well that Taiwan is suffering from China’s oppression on issues of sovereignty, international participation and diplomacy.
For him to accept Beijing’s so-called “one China” policy and cause the nation to be oppressed, Lien is “Taiwan’s troublemaker,” Hsu said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said that Lien’s comments contrasted with his stance in 2000 when he criticized China for being the troublemaker.
Lien’s remarks now are an effort to win the affection of Xi, Pan said.
“Lien had been nurtured by the nation, has served in high-ranking positions and is even now earning a large pension. His words contradict what the nation has done for him,” Pan said.
While Lien was the first to make the remark to Chinese leaders, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said in March 2009 at a press conference in Belize: “We should turn Taiwan from a troublemaker into a peacemaker through reconciliation across the Taiwan Strait.”
Another comment made by Lien also drew criticism from the opposition, who said it belittled Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Lien, in a meeting with Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing on Monday, said that cross-strait relations should be based on the principles of “the one China framework, cross-strait peace, mutual interest and integration, and revitalization of the Zhonghua minzu (中華民族) [Chinese ethnic group].”
The Presidential Office dismissed allegations that Lien was serving as a messenger for Ma.
Presidential Office spokesperson Lee Chia-fei (李佳霏) said that the delegation of Taiwanese businesspeople and politicians visiting China was not an official trip.
Former KMT legislator Kuo Su-chun (郭素春), spokesperson for the delegation, yesterday said Lien made the comments on the basis of the so-called “1992 consensus.”
“Mr Lien’s remarks are no different from the ‘1992 consensus.’ He works very hard for peaceful development across the Taiwan Strait and his words should not be distorted,” Kuo said.
Kuo accused the Presidential Office of trying to distance itself from Lien and the delegation, adding that the office should show more respect to Lien.
In response, Lee said the Presidential Office made the comments in response to reporters’ inquiries, adding that the public should not overinterpret relations between Ma and Lien.
Separately yesterday, DPP spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) reiterated the party’s insistence on transparency in all cross-strait engagements and said that Lien’s comments during his visit to Beijing had violated that principle.
“No individual or political party should advance initiatives and political negotiations that have not been authorized by the people without regard to the huge differences across the Taiwan Strait,” Lin said.
Additional reporting by Chris Wang and Jake Chung
REACHING OUT: President Tsai expressed condolences to the deceased man’s family and wished a speedy recovery to those who were wounded in the shooting The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) on Monday called on the US to label organizations associated with the suspect in the Irvine Taiwanese Presbyterian Church shooting as domestic terrorists, following accusations that he was a member of a group backing unification with ties to the Chinese government. David Wenwei Chou (周文偉), 68, was arrested on Sunday and is being held in lieu of US$1 million bail at the Orange County Intake Release Center over a mass shooting at the California church that left one dead and five wounded. Local police suspect the shooting was politically motivated after they found notes in
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
‘TOO RESTRICTIVE’: Ending US sales of weapons that do not fall under the category of ‘asymmetric’ would hamper Taiwan’s defense against China, two business groups said Taiwan’s weapons procurement decisions are made based on its needs, and are not influenced by individual arms dealers, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said yesterday after two US business groups questioned a US official’s comment on arms sales to Taiwan. US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Regional Security Mira Resnick told the business groups via video link on Saturday that Washington would adjust the types of weapons sold to Taiwan and end “most arms sales to Taiwan that do not fall under the category of ‘asymmetric.’” The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan and the US-Taiwan Business Council on Monday
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be