The recklessness and inconsistency displayed by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in formulating a proposal for a peace agreement with China within a decade raises great concerns over his ability to handle major cross-strait talks, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday.
Ma’s explanation of his initiative is “loose and simplistic,” Tsai said. “We didn’t see any sophisticated deliberation and planning behind the proposal.”
The remarks came in response to Ma’s announcement yesterday that the government would obtain the public’s approval through a referendum before pushing for a peace pact with China.
Ma’s position on referendums is inconsistent, Tsai said, because he opposed one when he was pushing for negotiations for the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which turned out to be neither transparent nor supervised by the legislature.
While the DPP has always called for a peaceful framework based on bilateral negotiations between sovereign entities, Ma’s initiative would proceed under a “one China” framework, which would leave Taiwan without bargaining chips, she said at a campaign stop in Greater Taichung.
Tsai added that Ma appeared to be manipulating the critical issue, which would have a great impact on Taiwan’s future, to benefit his presidential campaign.
At a separate setting yesterday, DPP spokesman Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that because Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) told the legislature on Wednesday that a referendum on the initiative was not necessary if most people supported it, only for the Presidential Office to later say that a referendum would be required, the Ma administration’s position on referendums was inconsistent.
Ma referred to his proposal as a peace “agreement,” which is usually signed between two belligerents, rather than a country-to-country “treaty,” DPP spokesman Liang Wen-jie (梁文傑) said, adding that Ma’s approach risked placing Taiwan under the “one China” framework.
“Ma’s impromptu initiative on this major issue is of great concern and is questionable,” Liang said.
DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) described Ma’s talk about a referendum as a “two-handed tactic” to benefit his presidential campaign.
“He has never supported referendums in the past and now he’s supportive — this is clearly a campaign strategy,” he said.
Ma used to list the removal of Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan as a prerequisite for bilateral talks, DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) said.
“Now he’s grown tired of bringing it up,” Yeh said.
On the pan-blue side, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators rallied behind Ma and his proposal.
KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said seeking a referendum prior to talks on a peace treaty was a “brilliant tactic” because now “the KMT is running the show.”
“Now the ball is in the DPP’s court. If the DPP rejects the idea, could it be that it is against permanent peace across the Taiwan Strait and the contention that Taiwan’s future should be decided by the people?” Lin said.
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) said a referendum on whether to start negotiations with China on a peace agreement cannot be interpreted as a plebiscite for independence or for unification.
The idea proposed by Ma could put the issue of the future direction of the country up for discussion during the campaign period, above the level of debates on cross-strait policy and competition among political parties in the election, he said.
KMT caucus whip Chao Li-yun (趙麗雲) said the KMT caucus would propose a referendum on the issue when necessary.
“The DPP used to employ the tactic of referendums to boost its campaigns. Why can’t the KMT initiate a referendum?” she said.
Chao said the idea to negotiate a peace accord with China was no different from that proposed by former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) on whether Taiwan needed to sign an agreement with China to build a peaceful and stable interaction framework in 2003, when Tsai Ing-wen was chairperson of the Mainland Affairs Council.
A Ministry of Foreign Affairs official yesterday said that a delegation that visited China for an APEC meeting did not receive any kind of treatment that downgraded Taiwan’s sovereignty. Department of International Organizations Director-General Jonathan Sun (孫儉元) said that he and a group of ministry officials visited Shenzhen, China, to attend the APEC Informal Senior Officials’ Meeting last month. The trip went “smoothly and safely” for all Taiwanese delegates, as the Chinese side arranged the trip in accordance with long-standing practices, Sun said at the ministry’s weekly briefing. The Taiwanese group did not encounter any political suppression, he said. Sun made the remarks when
The Taiwanese passport ranked 33rd in a global listing of passports by convenience this month, rising three places from last month’s ranking, but matching its position in January last year. The Henley Passport Index, an international ranking of passports by the number of designations its holder can travel to without a visa, showed that the Taiwan passport enables holders to travel to 139 countries and territories without a visa. Singapore’s passport was ranked the most powerful with visa-free access to 192 destinations out of 227, according to the index published on Tuesday by UK-based migration investment consultancy firm Henley and Partners. Japan’s and
BROAD AGREEMENT: The two are nearing a trade deal to reduce Taiwan’s tariff to 15% and a commitment for TSMC to build five more fabs, a ‘New York Times’ report said Taiwan and the US have reached a broad consensus on a trade deal, the Executive Yuan’s Office of Trade Negotiations said yesterday, after a report said that Washington is set to reduce Taiwan’s tariff rate to 15 percent. The New York Times on Monday reported that the two nations are nearing a trade deal to reduce Taiwan’s tariff rate to 15 percent and commit Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to building at least five more facilities in the US. “The agreement, which has been under negotiation for months, is being legally scrubbed and could be announced this month,” the paper said,
MIXED SOURCING: While Taiwan is expanding domestic production, it also sources munitions overseas, as some, like M855 rounds, are cheaper than locally made ones Taiwan and the US plan to jointly produce 155mm artillery shells, as the munition is in high demand due to the Ukraine-Russia war and should be useful in Taiwan’s self-defense, Armaments Bureau Director-General Lieutenant General Lin Wen-hsiang (林文祥) told lawmakers in Taipei yesterday. Lin was responding to questions about Taiwan’s partnership with allies in producing munitions at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee. Given the intense demand for 155mm artillery shells in Ukraine’s defense against the Russian invasion, and in light of Taiwan’s own defensive needs, Taipei and Washington plan to jointly produce 155mm shells, said Lin,
RSS