A Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator said yesterday that a legislative resolution, suggested by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) to revoke President Chen Shui-bian's (
The DPP, in the minority at the legislature, lost all of the 15 legislative showdowns while formulating the Referendum Law (
"The KMT and PFP are now deliberating an amendment to deprive the president of the power to take a referendum initiative, which indeed would prohibit people from any right to hold a referendum," Cho said.
The KMT and PFP meanwhile threatened to formulate a legislative resolution that would force Chen to recall the referendum on the two questions he unveiled on Friday. This is the way in which the opposition parties use bullying methods to get what they want in the legislature, Cho said.
Cho's criticisms were a response to opposition lawmakers vowing to push ahead with overhauling the Referendum Law to revoke the president's power of initiating referendums.
The KMT and PFP in addition planned to formulate a legislative resolution on the two referendum questions to compel the president to recall his referendum plan.
Cho said that the opposition's idea lacked a legal foundation in either the Constitution or the Referendum Law.
"Furthermore, the indirect democracy exercised by legislators cannot be stronger than a referendum, where the electorate directly voice their opinion through a public vote," he said.
Cho pledged that the DPP would protect the dignity of laws and safeguard people's right to hold referendums.
The pan-blue parties should easily be able to pass a legislative resolution, which merely requires approval from half of the 225-member legislature, since they form the majority in the Legislative Yuan.
A resolution driven by the opposition calling on the president to stop his referendum plan, however, would be unusual and engender a controversy over legislative power.
A resolution concerning the president's proclamation actually would be of little significance, since the legislative order has nothing to do with laws.
A DPP caucus leader nonetheless denounced such a motion.
"A legislative resolution cannot be in conflict with the law. The resolution proposed by the KMT and PFP would be null and void because President Chen proposed the referendum in accordance with the Referendum Law," said Tsai Huang-liang (
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) whip Cheng Cheng-lung (程振隆) reminded his opposition counterparts that a legislative resolution could not supersede a referendum.
"In that case, a referendum by the people of Quebec to decide whether they want to be separate from Canada could be replaced by a parliamentary resolution that there is no need to have a referendum," Cheng said.
In related news, PFP legislator leader Chou Hsi-wei (
The alliance said on Saturday that it would request a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices and also ask pan-blue mayors and county commissioners to boycott the referendum.
"Even if pan-blue mayors and county commissioners go along with it and support the referendum in their respective constituencies, what would happen if the council hands down its interpretation later and says the referendum is illegal?" Chou asked. He said that the local leaders would then, according to the law, face charges of holding illegal referendums.
"In that event, Chen or the Executive Yuan must assume all legal responsibility," Chou said, demanding that Chen make a public pledge about this matter.
(additional reporting by Huang Tai-lin)
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions
The Ministry of Economic Affairs said it plans to revise the export control list for strategic high-tech products by adding 18 items under three categories — advanced 3D printing equipment, advanced semiconductor equipment and quantum computers — which would require local manufacturers to obtain licenses for their export. The ministry’s announcement yesterday came as the International Trade Administration issued a 60-day preview period for planned revisions to the Export Control List for Dual Use Items and Technology (軍商兩用貨品及技術出口管制清單) and the Common Military List (一般軍用貨品清單), which fall under regulations governing export destinations for strategic high-tech commodities and specific strategic high-tech commodities. The
RSS