A Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator said yesterday that a legislative resolution, suggested by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) to revoke President Chen Shui-bian's (
The DPP, in the minority at the legislature, lost all of the 15 legislative showdowns while formulating the Referendum Law (
"The KMT and PFP are now deliberating an amendment to deprive the president of the power to take a referendum initiative, which indeed would prohibit people from any right to hold a referendum," Cho said.
The KMT and PFP meanwhile threatened to formulate a legislative resolution that would force Chen to recall the referendum on the two questions he unveiled on Friday. This is the way in which the opposition parties use bullying methods to get what they want in the legislature, Cho said.
Cho's criticisms were a response to opposition lawmakers vowing to push ahead with overhauling the Referendum Law to revoke the president's power of initiating referendums.
The KMT and PFP in addition planned to formulate a legislative resolution on the two referendum questions to compel the president to recall his referendum plan.
Cho said that the opposition's idea lacked a legal foundation in either the Constitution or the Referendum Law.
"Furthermore, the indirect democracy exercised by legislators cannot be stronger than a referendum, where the electorate directly voice their opinion through a public vote," he said.
Cho pledged that the DPP would protect the dignity of laws and safeguard people's right to hold referendums.
The pan-blue parties should easily be able to pass a legislative resolution, which merely requires approval from half of the 225-member legislature, since they form the majority in the Legislative Yuan.
A resolution driven by the opposition calling on the president to stop his referendum plan, however, would be unusual and engender a controversy over legislative power.
A resolution concerning the president's proclamation actually would be of little significance, since the legislative order has nothing to do with laws.
A DPP caucus leader nonetheless denounced such a motion.
"A legislative resolution cannot be in conflict with the law. The resolution proposed by the KMT and PFP would be null and void because President Chen proposed the referendum in accordance with the Referendum Law," said Tsai Huang-liang (
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) whip Cheng Cheng-lung (程振隆) reminded his opposition counterparts that a legislative resolution could not supersede a referendum.
"In that case, a referendum by the people of Quebec to decide whether they want to be separate from Canada could be replaced by a parliamentary resolution that there is no need to have a referendum," Cheng said.
In related news, PFP legislator leader Chou Hsi-wei (
The alliance said on Saturday that it would request a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices and also ask pan-blue mayors and county commissioners to boycott the referendum.
"Even if pan-blue mayors and county commissioners go along with it and support the referendum in their respective constituencies, what would happen if the council hands down its interpretation later and says the referendum is illegal?" Chou asked. He said that the local leaders would then, according to the law, face charges of holding illegal referendums.
"In that event, Chen or the Executive Yuan must assume all legal responsibility," Chou said, demanding that Chen make a public pledge about this matter.
(additional reporting by Huang Tai-lin)
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it
RSS