Omar Sharif Jr doesn’t agree with the upcoming marriage equality referendums in Taiwan.
“I never believe in the majority being able to vote on the human rights of a minority,” the Egyptian actor, model and LGBTQ activist says. “That doesn’t seem fair.”
Sharif says these decisions should happen top down from the legislature or the judiciary — which did happen in Taiwan before the referendums sprung up — and also from the bottom up with civil engagement.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“There has to be an education component. You can’t legislate acceptance. You can only legislate equality. They have to go hand in hand, and it feels like one really preceded the other here,” he says.
The Taipei Times sat down with Sharif during Saturday’s Oslo Freedom Forum in Taiwan after he shared his story of becoming the first public personality to ever come out, in 2012, as openly gay in the Arab world. He also hosted a luncheon workshop with Cindy Su (蘇珊), CEO of the Lobby Alliance for LGBT Human Rights, where they discussed Taiwan’s current situation and fielded questions from attendees from around the world.
MARGINALIZED NATION
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
Taiwan’s situation is light years ahead of Egypt, where homosexuality is legal but the government has been cracking down on the LGBTQ community through anti-debauchery laws. Sharif grew up in the spotlight as “Egypt’s favorite son,” the grandson of legendary film icon Omar Sharif.
“Growing up a Sharif in Egypt is almost like being born a Kennedy,” he says.
Sharif left the country after coming out as both gay and half-Jewish in 2012, shortly after the election of Islamist president Mohamed Morsi. He received a torrent of hateful messages and death threats, but also many letters of support — but he ultimately decided to leave the country for Canada.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
Sharif knew about the pro and anti-marriage equality referendums before arriving, but says he was shocked to learn that Taiwan only has official diplomatic ties with 17 countries.
“Almost every Taiwanese knows what it feels like to be marginalized by the family of nations out there,” he says. “I don’t know why you would do that inwardly to your own citizens. You tell [LGBTQ] people that they’ll have a different set of laws … that’s sort of what the world is doing to you. How hurtful is that?”
After speaking to forum participants and other people in Taiwan, Sharif believes that despite the setbacks, Taiwan will eventually succeed in its quest for LGBTQ equality.
“While you are struggling now, you are taking huge strides,” he says. “In every progressive movement in the world, sometimes you take two steps forward and one step back. I’m optimistic, because when I listen to other people talk here, I see how entrenched democratic values are and what a source of pride it is for Taiwanese.”
ACCEPTANCE EDUCATION
In his travels to share his story and advocate for LGBTQ rights, Sharif says he’s always surprised how often marriage equality is seen as the “pinnacle of LGBTQ equality” when to him, it’s just the beginning.
“So long as people are being bullied in school, made homeless, thrown out of their families… as long as there are hate crimes, as long as trans women are the number one demographic likely to be subject to violence … what does it mean that we can get married?” he says. “It’s an amazing thing to strive for, but there’s so much work to do after that.”
He repeatedly stresses that acceptance cannot be legislated, and education from a young age is the only way to change people’s mindsets. In Taiwan, whether LGBTQ issues should be included in gender equity education is one of the items anti-marriage equality groups have placed on the referendum. Sharif says education should begin as early as possible.
“Education won’t change anyone’s opinions on who they are and who they’re going to love, but it can create more safe spaces for people to be who they actually are,” he says. “We don’t need to be talking about sexualized things, just about difference in human beings. The same way we teach people to love our handicapped neighbors, people with different ethnic identities…”
Outside of the classroom, however, sharing stories will help to bring about positive. For example, he says the US has been fairly successful because people have been sharing stories with friends and loved ones since the first National Coming Out Day in 1988.
“All of a sudden, people weren’t just facts, figures, statistics, moral and ethical debates,” he says. “They were your brothers, your sisters, your coworkers, people you knew. Everyone knows someone who will be affected by this law. At the end of the day, if you know someone is being hurt, and you know that person, can you allow for it?”
Despite his tireless advocacy, Sharif admits that he’s growing tired of telling the same story over and over again. But nobody has been able to take up the mantle as the situation in the Middle East is not improving. He can count at most three public figures that have revealed their homosexuality.
“I think all activism needs new blood and new stories,” he says. “But too few people come out in the Middle East because it’s difficult and outright dangerous. Until they do, I’ll keep doing it.”
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The older you get, and the more obsessed with your health, the more it feels as if life comes down to numbers: how many more years you can expect; your lean body mass; your percentage of visceral fat; how dense your bones are; how many kilos you can squat; how long you can deadhang; how often you still do it; your levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol; your resting heart rate; your overnight blood oxygen level; how quickly you can run; how many steps you do in a day; how many hours you sleep; how fast you are shrinking; how
“‘Medicine and civilization’ were two of the main themes that the Japanese colonial government repeatedly used to persuade Taiwanese to accept colonization,” wrote academic Liu Shi-yung (劉士永) in a chapter on public health under the Japanese. The new government led by Goto Shimpei viewed Taiwan and the Taiwanese as unsanitary, sources of infection and disease, in need of a civilized hand. Taiwan’s location in the tropics was emphasized, making it an exotic site distant from Japan, requiring the introduction of modern ideas of governance and disease control. The Japanese made great progress in battling disease. Malaria was reduced. Dengue was
RSS