It's been an exceptionally long wait for Potter fans for this, the sixth and penultimate installment of the series, but fans are unlikely to be disappointed. David Yates, who did such a splendid job with Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007), is back at the helm to good effect as the mood of the series continues to darken.
As with previous installments, there is once again simply too much story to cram into the two and a half hour running time. Those not familiar with the books, or who have not at least been following the films, are left to flounder without the slightest compunction. Yates dives directly into this new adventure with no preamble, giving up any pretense that this is a stand-alone feature.
The last two years have seen the principle cast grow up a good deal, and Half-Blood Prince has a significant high school romance sub-plot that contributes much of the action and most of the humor of this installment. The romantic comedy elements are not particularly slick and are aimed very much at the younger teen crowd with tentative maneuvering, hypersensitivity and arch references to snogging. Nevertheless, while young love is portrayed in broad brushstrokes, Yates has enough real sympathy for his young stars and the tribulations of adolescent romance to pull off this rather difficult act without embarrassing himself or the audience.
Moreover, stars Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) and Emma Watson (Hermione Granger) have managed to maintain a level of continuity in their characters, giving the audience more of an investment in them than would normally be possible within the relatively short span of a feature film so crammed with other material.
Unfortunately, the teen romance takes up a good deal of time, so that the magical machinations of the wizard world can only be given rather cursory treatment, and the assembled adult cast, with a few notable exceptions, are left with very little to do. Maggie Smith (Minerva McGonagall) is all but ignored, and Helena Bonham Carter (Bellatrix Lestrange) swans around in a caricature of being mad, bad and dangerous to know.
While the heroic trio of Radcliffe, Grint and Watson do a more than adequate job, it is Michael Gambon (Professor Albus Dumbledore) and Jim Broadbent (Professor Horace Slughorn) who give Half-Blood Prince its depth, and Yates lingers perhaps a little too lovingly on these two old men of the theater. Gambon has settled into his role as principal of Hogwarts and Harry’s mentor beautifully, and this installment allows him to pull out all the stops as the master wizard who makes the ultimate sacrifice for the greater good. Broadbent, who plays the minor but pivotal character of Professor Slughorn, is perhaps the most enjoyable character to watch, and in his relatively short screen time makes an enduring impression.
A new arrival on the scene is Bonnie Wright, who plays Ginny Weasley, Harry’s love interest. Previously she had been very much in the background, but with Half-Blood Prince she emerges as a strong and potentially interesting character who is likely to blossom in the final installment. She helps provide the young love aspects of this film with a little gravity, in contrast to Grint’s playing his own romantic predicament for laughs, not always with complete success.
The climactic set piece in which Harry and Dumbledore delve deep into an enchanted cave in search of a secret treasure, might all too easily be part of the footage for a video game and produced a lack of visceral, as opposed to purely visual, thrills. Yates, who has clearly worked hard to tell a good story, allows himself to get caught up in the special effects and at this crucial moment leaves his dramatic sensibility behind. Having dawdled over the romance, he has to rush through the heroics, giving this highly elaborate set piece a rather cursory and unsatisfactory quality.
For all its faults and unevenness, Half-Blood Prince is good to look at, but Yates is clearly putting the pieces in place for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows, which is scheduled for release in two parts next year and in 2011. At the end of two and a half hours, one has the feeling of having sat through an extended introduction to the main event, not altogether a satisfactory way to leave the cinema.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS