It's been an exceptionally long wait for Potter fans for this, the sixth and penultimate installment of the series, but fans are unlikely to be disappointed. David Yates, who did such a splendid job with Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007), is back at the helm to good effect as the mood of the series continues to darken.
As with previous installments, there is once again simply too much story to cram into the two and a half hour running time. Those not familiar with the books, or who have not at least been following the films, are left to flounder without the slightest compunction. Yates dives directly into this new adventure with no preamble, giving up any pretense that this is a stand-alone feature.
The last two years have seen the principle cast grow up a good deal, and Half-Blood Prince has a significant high school romance sub-plot that contributes much of the action and most of the humor of this installment. The romantic comedy elements are not particularly slick and are aimed very much at the younger teen crowd with tentative maneuvering, hypersensitivity and arch references to snogging. Nevertheless, while young love is portrayed in broad brushstrokes, Yates has enough real sympathy for his young stars and the tribulations of adolescent romance to pull off this rather difficult act without embarrassing himself or the audience.
Moreover, stars Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) and Emma Watson (Hermione Granger) have managed to maintain a level of continuity in their characters, giving the audience more of an investment in them than would normally be possible within the relatively short span of a feature film so crammed with other material.
Unfortunately, the teen romance takes up a good deal of time, so that the magical machinations of the wizard world can only be given rather cursory treatment, and the assembled adult cast, with a few notable exceptions, are left with very little to do. Maggie Smith (Minerva McGonagall) is all but ignored, and Helena Bonham Carter (Bellatrix Lestrange) swans around in a caricature of being mad, bad and dangerous to know.
While the heroic trio of Radcliffe, Grint and Watson do a more than adequate job, it is Michael Gambon (Professor Albus Dumbledore) and Jim Broadbent (Professor Horace Slughorn) who give Half-Blood Prince its depth, and Yates lingers perhaps a little too lovingly on these two old men of the theater. Gambon has settled into his role as principal of Hogwarts and Harry’s mentor beautifully, and this installment allows him to pull out all the stops as the master wizard who makes the ultimate sacrifice for the greater good. Broadbent, who plays the minor but pivotal character of Professor Slughorn, is perhaps the most enjoyable character to watch, and in his relatively short screen time makes an enduring impression.
A new arrival on the scene is Bonnie Wright, who plays Ginny Weasley, Harry’s love interest. Previously she had been very much in the background, but with Half-Blood Prince she emerges as a strong and potentially interesting character who is likely to blossom in the final installment. She helps provide the young love aspects of this film with a little gravity, in contrast to Grint’s playing his own romantic predicament for laughs, not always with complete success.
The climactic set piece in which Harry and Dumbledore delve deep into an enchanted cave in search of a secret treasure, might all too easily be part of the footage for a video game and produced a lack of visceral, as opposed to purely visual, thrills. Yates, who has clearly worked hard to tell a good story, allows himself to get caught up in the special effects and at this crucial moment leaves his dramatic sensibility behind. Having dawdled over the romance, he has to rush through the heroics, giving this highly elaborate set piece a rather cursory and unsatisfactory quality.
For all its faults and unevenness, Half-Blood Prince is good to look at, but Yates is clearly putting the pieces in place for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows, which is scheduled for release in two parts next year and in 2011. At the end of two and a half hours, one has the feeling of having sat through an extended introduction to the main event, not altogether a satisfactory way to leave the cinema.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless