Francesca Salcido went on 300 dates in 24 hours without breaking a sweat. Her encounters with aspiring beaus happened online at SpeedDate.com, a US start-up built on a belief that it need not take more than 90 seconds to find a life partner.
“We may be using Web cams and Internet technologies, but you’re still trying to find that chemistry,” SpeedDate co-founder Dan Abelon said. “And if it isn’t there, you just move on to the next person.”
The Web site and its competitors apply the latest Internet technology to speed dating, a phenomenon that started a decade ago with men and women darting from table to table to chat in rapid-fire succession at a time keeper’s signal.
“If people decide they don’t like someone, they usually know within 30 seconds,” said Stephen Stokols, chief executive of SpeedDate rival WooMe.com.
“If you meet someone you like, three minutes isn’t long enough. If you don’t like them, 30 seconds is too long.”
Automated timers at SpeedDate and WooMe cut off online video chats after as little as 90 seconds or as long as three minutes. Those that felt romance kindling during curt exchanges can later reconnect to fan the flames.
The speed-dating formula differs dramatically from the format of most dating Web sites, which require users to detail their lives and interests in intricate profiles or extensive questionnaires.
Love seekers on those sites are matched based on their profiles and then chat via e-mail before deciding whether to meet in person.
“We’re more like dating in real life,” Abelon said. “If you see someone you like in real life, you don’t go up to them with your resume and compare. You just talk.”
Instead of sitting at a coffee shop or a bar, speed dating Web sites let potential mates meet using Web cams and microphones.
“I wanted to be a little ridiculous and put myself out there,” Salcido said.
“My mom said the more places you put your resume, the better chance you have for finding a job. I figured I’d do the same thing with dating.”
When SpeedDate went live a year ago, it hosted 1,000 dates its first night.
Now it is a setting for from 100,000 to 120,000 virtual dates daily, with most of those online encounters orchestrated by Web applications in profile pages of social networking Web sites MySpace and Facebook.
SpeedDate boasts users in nearly 200 countries.
WooMe.com reports that 1,000 to 4,000 registered users are logged into the site at any given time.
Stokols says that while users of SpeedDate.com are trying to find romance, most WooMe.com users have learned that true love may be fleeting but real friends are forever.
“Eight to 10 percent of our users have been to real dating sites,” Stokols said. “We’re more about meeting new friends, not necessarily meeting new dates.”
In this spirit, WooMe sent two of its users on a US road trip to meet in the flesh 1,000 of the new friends they made on the Web site.
The duo’s bar-filled adventures are being memorialized in text and video on the aptly named WooAroundAmerica.com.
“The dating stories are good to hear, and we’ve got plenty of them,” Stokols explained.
“What interests me are the stories that are unique to our platform where we’ve come up with a new way for people to extend their social network.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50