The “one China” principle has prevented Taiwan from joining the WHO. This is wrong. In the wake of the out-of-control Wuhan coronavirus, Taiwan should be permitted to join the WHO under the name of “Taiwan” and it should exist as a separate country within the WHO.
At a time when Beijing has partially locked down more than 80 cities in nearly 20 provinces, and at a time when the official death toll exceeds more than 1,380 people with more than 63,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 as of Friday, Taiwan — home to nearly 24 million people — is being blocked from membership from UN agencies like the WHO and the International Civil Aviation Organization.
“Last week, when WHO started to publish a world map of the epidemic using color coding to indicate the same level of seriousness, Taiwan was given same level as China. That has a direct impact on Taiwanese people and airlines that are traveling there,” said Chi Chun-huei (紀駿輝), a Taiwanese-American professor at Oregon State University who specializes in global health.
On Thursday last week, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused China, which includes Taiwan on its daily update as “Taiwan Province,” of feeding incorrect data to the WHO, and complained about how the WHO referred to the nation. The WHO calls the self-governed territory “Taipei and environs.”
Previously, it has used “Taiwan, China,” “Taipei municipality” and “Taipei.” However, these are not the correct names for it. Its rightful name is Taiwan, and its formal name is the Republic of China.
Clearly the WHO is succumbing to political pressure from Beijing. Beijing sees itself as the ruler of democratic Taiwan, and has used its clout to diminish the nation’s presence on the world stage since Beijing-skeptic President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took power in May 2016.
The WHO should be a nonpolitical organization pursuing the highest health standards for humanity and should not solely serve Beijing’s interests. This represents a failure of leadership at the highest levels of the WHO.
With the number of illnesses from the Wuhan coronavirus doubling every six-and-a-half days, health is a basic human right, as well as a universal value, regardless of differences in race, religion, political beliefs, economic or social situations.
Taiwan is constantly left out of the loop with respect to important global conversations that involve people’s safety. It is not just the people of Taiwan’s safety, but the safety of those across borders. While Taiwanese health officials receive information on unfolding health crises such as COVID-19 from counterparts in China or elsewhere, no formal mechanism exists to ensure that it is received in a timely manner.
Taiwan should be allowed equal participation in all WHO events.
Taiwan has the best healthcare system in the world, business magazine CEOWorld concluded in its 2019 Health Care Index. The list considered the overall quality of healthcare, including the infrastructure, staff competency, cost, availability and government readiness, the magazine said.
Taiwan has a history of managing previous outbreaks in the region well, from SARS to African swine fever. It should not simply be a passive recipient of thirdhand information; it should have a seat at the table in WHO planning and preparatory meetings.
Instead of shunning Taiwan, the WHO should cooperate with medical institutions throughout the nation to help procure a low-cost vaccine for COVID-19 that the WHO could distribute at cost to the countries south of the Sahara, the Middle East and North Africa.
The coronavirus outbreak is deeply worrying, but also a timely reminder that Taiwan needs to be readmitted to the WHO and other international bodies.
It is also in the national interests of Australia, Japan, South Korea and the US to encourage greater interaction in areas like health with Taiwan.
Taiwan has a long history of being bullied by China, a situation that many other countries are slowly waking up to. Only international support can resist Beijing’s efforts to erase Taiwan. Democratic countries should stand together to prove that democracy is not just a different but a better form of government than authoritarianism.
Arthur Tane is executive director of the Council on Middle East Relations, director of the Middle East-East Asia Office and the MEES series editor.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS