Some Chinese companies that are closed due to the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak are expected to resume operations as early as this week.
However, the move has caused concern over likely person-to-person transmissions, fanning fears that the virus would spread even further, as it has not been effectively contained.
Local governments and businesses in China should decide carefully when to resume operations, and evaluate whether they have the facilities to test suspected cases and sufficient protective gear for employees.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, the biggest assembler of Apple Inc’s iPhones, on Friday told its employees in Shenzhen, China, not to return to work today as planned and await further instructions, Bloomberg reported, citing a text message it saw.
Amid a shortage of medical equipment in China, the company on Thursday began trial production of protective masks and medical clothing to be used at its Shenzhen plant, Reuters reported.
However, not all companies have the resources to take such measures.
The reopening of Chinese businesses — which are crucial to the global supply chain and markets — might lead to logistics disruptions and higher operational costs, as suppliers in a dozen cities are under lockdown while mandatory quarantine rules are implemented in more cities.
A shortage of personnel and raw materials is likely to be the biggest problem affecting the supply chain after the resumption of work.
Even though some Taiwanese businesses had relocated part of their operations to Vietnam or elsewhere before the outbreak, they would still face supply chain disruptions, as many of their components, materials and even personnel come from China.
China is also facing growing suspicion over its pledge to buy more US goods under the “phase one” trade deal it signed with Washington early last month, as well as whether Chinese companies would declare force majeure to get out of long-term contracts with their overseas partners.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) assured US President Donald Trump during a telephone call on Thursday that China would meet its pledge to buy US$200 billion of US goods over the next two years, although there might be some initial delays, US National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow told the Wall Street Journal on Friday.
However, it is not known whether Beijing would request exceptions from the trade agreement, depending on how its efforts to contain the virus pan out.
French oil company Total on Thursday became the first global energy supplier to reject a force majeure notice from a liquefied natural gas buyer in China, which wanted to back out of a contract amid the outbreak, Reuters reported.
More Chinese companies making similar declarations to avoid their contractual obligations could have an adverse affect on global energy and commodity prices.
The outbreak is causing problems that are beyond companies’ control. Economists have warned that it presents a risk to business operations, manufacturing supply chains and the outlook of global markets.
However, it also tests Beijing’s crisis management capabilities and draws global attention to its public governance, and if China acts irresponsibly or inappropriately, its behavior might have an even greater negative effect on the international marketplace and the global outlook than the disease itself.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with