Taiwan has laws prohibiting false news and the dissemination of opinion poll results shortly before elections, but to more effectively prevent unwanted influence, there should be a mechanism to flag posts from fake social media accounts.
A report published on the Liberty Times’ (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) Web site on Wednesday said that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Year’s Day speech garnered numerous comments that were critical of her, some offensive.
One commenter wrote: “Look at all these comments critical of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on a ‘green’ news Web site. The writing is on the wall for the DPP.”
However, clicking on the user’s account revealed what appeared to be a fake account. The profile picture was a graphic and the account had few connections, most of which had Chinese names written in simplified characters, while there were political posts of a dubious nature on its timeline.
Most of the accounts that made the negative comments had similar characteristics. Unfortunately, some people engaged with the posts, seemingly unaware that they were most likely from fake accounts.
Facebook — which provides commenting functionality on the Web sites of the Taipei Times and the Liberty Times, as well as most other news Web sites in Taiwan — has made strides in eliminating false news reports. However, algorithms are imperfect and fact-checking is slow.
“Technology companies like to claim that algorithms are free of personal bias, yet they inevitably reflect the subjective decisions of those who designed them, and journalistic integrity is not a priority for engineers,” Nicky Woolf wrote in a Guardian opinion piece on Nov. 29, 2016.
A BBC report on Sept. 14 last year said that three years later, Facebook is still using an approach that relies on posts to be flagged either by an algorithm or a user, and then reviewed by a human.
Those who disseminate false reports are turning to images and videos to get their message across, and while Facebook has plans to stop those methods more effectively — including on Instagram, which it owns — the BBC report said: “Instagram hopes artificial intelligence will enable it to train algorithms to detect false content in the future, reducing the need for relying on fact-checking services and users.”
Unfortunately, there might be a long wait before such a system bears fruit, while some are skeptical that machines will ever make good decisions on their own.
A better approach might be to make algorithms act in a more subtle, but still proactive, manner. Posts by new accounts, those with few friends, or those with questionable timelines could be flagged and an identifier placed over the account’s username that warns people to use caution when engaging them. The identifiers could be removed if the account is verified, or after it has demonstrated its validity by engaging in more normal usage patterns.
The measures could also be applied to accounts that frequently post on Taiwanese pages, as well as Instagram and YouTube accounts created with foreign IP addresses.
Puma Shen (沈伯洋), an assistant professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate School of Criminology, on Dec. 22 said that China is increasingly targeting Taiwanese through YouTube videos uploaded through foreign IP addresses. An identifier next to such channels would alert Taiwanese to exercise caution.
The government need not censor online content, but it should ensure that Taiwanese are informed when content is from questionable sources.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with