On Nov. 22, the Hsinchu District Court convicted Lo Chi-hsiang (羅吉祥), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayor of Hsinchu County’s Jhudong Township (竹東), on charges of vote-buying. It gave him a prison term of three years and 10 months, and deprived him of his civil rights for four years. Upon conviction, Lo was dismissed from office in accordance with the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法).
The Local Government Act (地方制度法) does say that county governments can appoint an acting mayor when a township mayor is suspended or dismissed from office, but the Hsinchu County Government used this power to designate Lo’s wife, Chang Shun-peng (張順朋), as Jhudong’s acting mayor. She took office on Nov. 29.
The county government said it made the move because Chang has considerable leadership and administration experience, is familiar with township affairs and can continue Lo’s policies.
The decision shows the county government’s strong support for a mayor mired in a vote-buying scandal. The county keeps telling everyone to reject vote buying, but it is reaffirming the policy achievements of a mayor who engaged in the practice.
The county’s message seems to be that it does not matter that Lo won his seat by election fraud, and that as long as the county supports him, someone from his circle can become acting mayor. What kind of a legal system produces such a ridiculous result?
The problem is that the Local Government Act only stipulates that “where the mayor of a ... township/city ... is removed from office ... the county government shall appoint an acting mayor.”
The act does allow the local government to exercise administrative discretion when appointing a mayor, but if a law’s implementation can lead to a result as absurd as allowing the spouse of a dismissed mayor to become acting mayor, then the law needs to be reviewed.
The Ministry of the Interior has officially interpreted this power as follows: “For the advancement of local government affairs, when a county government evaluates and appoints an acting mayor, it is advisable for it to assign a person of equivalent rank or who has a sufficient degree of administrative experience.”
The ministry used the language “it is advisable,” rather than “it should,” which is why the county could appoint Chang, although she lacks equivalent rank and administrative experience.
Even a Hsinchu County councilor can only call on the Legislative Yuan to amend the Local Government Act by qualifying such appointments with objective conditions, such as credentials and experience.
Although local powers of self-governance are important, they do no good if allowed to devolve into tools for political parties to consolidate their interests. Attaching objective conditions would be one way to safeguard proper township governance.
Joy Lien is a lawyer and a New Power Party Hsinchu County councilor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
Following the outbreak of conflict in Iran, TikTok was flooded with videos targeting Taiwanese users. Many featured artificial intelligence (AI)-generated anchors posing as Taiwanese broadcasters with localized traditional Chinese subtitles. The videos warned of imminent social collapse due to liquefied natural gas shortages, blamed the Democratic Progressive Party and its alleged failed energy policies for a fabricated crisis, and used recycled footage from unrelated events to create the impression Taiwan stood on the edge of systemic breakdown. By saturating the information environment with falsehoods or selectively edited material designed to trigger emotional responses, malign actors can exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and
Taiwan’s leading position in the global semiconductor industry is not, as some claim, based on misconceptions, a result of “stealing.” It was built upon formal, transparent and costly technology transfer agreements between the Taiwanese government and US enterprises half a century ago. According to the oral history of Hu Ding-hua (胡定華), a pioneer in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the origin of Taiwan’s integrated circuit (IC) technology dates back to the “IC pilot factory” in the 1970s. The implementation of this project fully complied with international commercial standards and legal procedures. First, the project completed formal contract signing and payment. In 1975,
RSS