Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said in an interview on Oct. 3 with an online news site that “Presidential Office Secretary-General Chen Chu (陳菊) is a sinner against democracy: She thinks that just because she was imprisoned in the first half of her life she can get away with doing whatever she wants, however wrong, in the latter half of her life.”
Ko had also said before — to inflate the influence of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the party he launched to boost his own reputation — that the officials surrounding President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) are all corrupt.
Tsai and Chen should consider suing him.
As a political victim of the White Terror era, like Chen, I have no choice, but to voice my condemnation.
My brother, Shih Ming-te (施明德), who sprearheaded the protest that became known as the Kaohsiung Incident in 1979, became a wanted man, described by media across the nation as a notorious bandit leader.
His photograph was displayed on wanted posters, and put up on notice boards and utility poles in all train stations and ports. The secret police and the state security mechanism watched our homes and harassed our family.
The eight defendants accused under military law were all indicted under Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Punishment of Rebellion Act (懲治叛亂條例), which is punishable by death.
A climate of terror dominated the whole island at that time. Thanks to advice given to then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) by international human rights advocates, as well as local and foreign academics, the outstanding oral argument of the eight brave defendants during the trial, and the mostly objective coverage of the print media, Taiwan received the opportunity to take a step toward democracy after this.
Even more commendable is that family members and lawyers of the Kaohsiung Incident’s victims subsequently ran for office.
If not for the sacrifice of these victims, who after their release from prison fought for democracy and freedom, as well as for citizens voting directly for municipality mayors and the president, Ko, a doctor at National Taiwan University Hospital during the Incident, would not have had the opportunity to be elected as Taipei mayor, nor would he have the chance to run for president.
If not for the help of the Democratic Progressive Party in the 2014 Taipei mayoral election, Ko would not have defeated Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Sean Lien (連勝文), nor would he have the chance to insult Chen and Tsai.
During his 2014 campaign, Ko, fishing for sympathy, said that he was a family member of a 228 Incident victim. He won the election. At that time, he boasted that he would clear up five controversial development projects, but failed to follow through on his promise. He was re-elected last year by a narrow margin of only about 3,000 votes.
Ko now aspires to higher office and has his eye on the 2024 presidential race. Failing to become the People First Party candidate, he established his own party, for which he appropriated the name of a party founded in 1927 by Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水).
He tried to get Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), Taiwan’s richest man, to sponsor the TPP legislative candidates. On winning enough seats in the Legislative Yuan, the TPP would be eligible to nominate its own presidential candidate,: namely Ko.
This ungrateful, pro-China politician becoming eligible to run for the presidency would surely be another disaster for Taiwan. Hopefully, nobody would be blind enough to vote for Ko and the TPP.
Shih Ming-hsiung is a political victim.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS