One wonders whether Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate, is aware that the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮), also known as the Longmen Nuclear Power Plant, is fitted with a deployable communication and information system (DCIS), or that the whole plant uses digital technology, with a system that is untested elsewhere.
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) on Feb. 2 issued a news release that said: “The design of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant’s safety instrument system [SIS] is the only one of its kind in the world and should have been replaced 20 years ago; in addition, the supplier no longer makes the system, and spares are difficult to source.”
The issue of finding a supplier for an SIS system for the plant is complex and the system’s interface entails a great deal of technology.
It was eventually decided that General Electric (GE) would supply the entire system, but that company appears to have exited the market for supplying digital instrument control systems, so there is little way to safely restart work on or upgrade the Longmen plant.
Some have suggested looking to Japan for ways the plant can be upgraded, as some Japanese nuclear plants also use a DCIS. However, a research report on the plant’s instrument control system published in 2003 by Taipower nuclear generation engineer Chen Mao-yuan (陳茂元) said that the world’s sole advanced boiling water reactor (ABWR) using a similar system is Japan’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant, but the DCIS there is used at a much reduced scope than the one in the Longmen plant.
In 1998, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research associate researcher Hsu Hsien-hsing (徐?星) and others published a paper on digital instrument control system technologies used in Japan, Germany and France, and how they could be implemented in the Longmen plant and for the Taiwan Research Reactor System Improvement and Utilization Promotion Project.
The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant ABWR network employs separate sets of cables — one for the control signal and the other for transmitting warning signals — and differed from the one at the Longmen plant, it said.
The dual network design used in the Japanese plant could lighten the load on individual networks and mitigate problems with response times, as well as reduce the complexity of the instrument control system, it said.
Clearly, the instrument control system used in the Longmen plant is far more complex than the one in the Japanese plant.
Does Han intend to look into the design of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant when he considers restarting work on or upgrading the Longmen plant?
In 2009, Taipower nuclear technology engineer Wu Tung-ming (吳東明) attended the Sixth American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies in Tennessee. In his report of the trip, Wu said these conferences are the major platforms for exchanges in the field of instrumentation, control and human interfaces, and very few organizations or experts actively engaged in these fields would forgo the opportunity to attend.
And yet, GE has not sent representatives to these conferences for several consecutive years. Neither has it exhibited at any related industrial shows, leading Wu to wonder whether GE was still competing in the field of digital instruments, or whether it had exited the game altogether.
One wonders whether Han could perhaps enlighten him.
Yang Mu-huo is director of the Yanliao Anti-nuclear Self-help Association.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with