On Aug. 2, the Shanghai-based news Web site The Paper published an opinion piece headlined “False, exaggerated and empty talk are another kind of corruption,” saying that there is an easily overlooked form of political corruption — corruption of words and speech.
This happens when officials brag about themselves and flatter others, and when they gloss over problems but embellish their own supposed achievements, it said.
On Dec. 26, 2017, the term “tall talk, little action” was coined by the “Strong Nation Forum” on the People’s Daily Web site. This is another name for the same kind of corruption.
The original post said that bureaucrats talk like this not only to hoodwink their underlings, but also their superiors, and to win rewards while concealing their own incompetence.
This behavior harms the nation and runs contrary to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) demands and the public’s expectations, the author added.
The People’s Daily is the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) premier mouthpiece, while behind the state-funded The Paper stands Shanghai’s two main newspapers: the Jiefang Daily and Wenhui Bao. The opinions expressed in these two papers are a good sign of which way the wind is blowing in the CCP.
What if Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, is judged by this CCP standard?
His words and deeds ever since his mayoral campaign are clearly meant to conceal his incompetence. They are corrupt and harmful to the nation — they would indeed run contrary to Xi’s demands and the public’s expectations.
So how can the CCP still support Han? It can only be to let him wreak havoc in Taiwan.
The political views Han raised during his mayoral campaign were absurdly unrealistic, but he justified them by saying: “It is a beautiful thing to have a dream.”
The people who voted for him let “love and tolerance” blind them to his true character.
On April 23, Han hinted at his presidential ambitions by saying: “Kaohsiung can only do better if Taiwan does well. Only if Taiwan can change can I really change Kaohsiung.”
Since then he has done ridiculous things such as climbing a tree to look for hollows that might harbor mosquitoes, piling up files to show his “heavy” workload and claiming that the state apparatus is spying on him.
At an American Chamber of Commerce luncheon on Wednesday last week, Han spoke a quirky jumble of Chinese and English.
Things that cast doubt on Han’s morals keep coming to light, such as his wife’s ownership of an illegally built “farmhouse,” his fondness for alcohol and gambling and his posturing as a “man of the people.” No wonder his opinion poll ratings keep sinking.
The most worrying question is what would happen if Han really does become president and US-China tensions become fraught enough to force Taiwan to take a side.
Han said that Kaohsiung can only do better if Taiwan does well. He has been spending more energy on his presidential ambitions than on governing Kaohsiung. What if Han, as president, were to say: “Taiwan can only do better if China does well,” then drops Taiwan and goes to serve as vice chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference?
Han does not even meet China’s moral standards. Does the KMT really want someone like him to be its candidate for president?
Yu Kung is a Taiwanese businessman operating in China.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with