Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has said that a tracking device might have been installed in his car and accused the “state apparatus” of putting it there to stalk him.
However, many people think that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate is trying to shift the focus away from his poor performance as mayor.
More seriously, Han’s accusation about a tracking device being installed in his car could make him criminally liable.
If Han lodges a legal complaint, but fails to produce concrete evidence, he might be guilty of making false accusations.
The Ciaotou District Prosecutors’ Office has said that installing a tracking device would constitute an offense against privacy as defined in the Criminal Code.
The office said that invasion of privacy falls under the category of offenses that cannot be prosecuted unless the alleged victim lodges a legal complaint, so it asked Han to provide police or the office with pertinent information so that it can investigate and prosecute the case.
Han lives in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying District (左營), which is under the jurisdiction of the Ciaotou District Prosecutors’ Office. However, the office said it has not received any such information.
The office therefore asked Han to provide evidence, if there is any, and said that it would thoroughly investigate the case if he does so.
If Han does not lodge a legal complaint, it would be obvious that he has no faith in his own accusations. It would mean that he is playing the role of “political victim” even though he knows full well that there is no tracking device.
As well as doing an injustice to civil servants, it would clearly show that he takes the nation’s voters for fools.
If Han does file a complaint without providing any evidence to back it up, he could be guilty of making “malicious accusations.”
Article 171 of the Criminal Code states: “A person who without naming a specific offender makes a malicious accusation before a competent public official shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of not more than NT$300. A person who without naming a specific offender causes the institution of criminal proceedings by forging or altering evidence of an offense or by making use of such forged or altered evidence shall be subject to the same punishment.”
To put it simply, if Han does not dare lodge a complaint, it would be obvious that he has been play-acting and pretending to be a “political victim” to draw attention away from his poor performance in the office of mayor.
Han fancies himself as both actor and director. He likes to put on a good show, but his latest dramatic production really goes over the top.
Huang Di-ying is a lawyer and chairman of the Taiwan Forever Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with