When a problem persists long enough, people either consider it unsolvable or become accustomed to it and emotionally numb. Many such problems exist in science and technology development in Taiwan.
The Ministry of Science and Technology on Aug. 2 held a roundtable conference attended by business leaders and academics to discuss the challenges facing the nation’s science and technology development. The conference, hosted by Vice President Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁), was also the start of a series of meetings among government officials, industry representatives and academics in preparation for the 11th National Science and Technology Conference at the end of this year.
Although the participants were important figures, their suggestions for and criticisms of the nation’s scientific research development have failed to impress.
For instance, Minister of Science and Technology Chen Liang-gee (陳良基) said that an industry heavyweight at the conference recommended that industrial development and academic research must implement division of labor. They also suggested that government resources be invested in basic research that the private sector cannot take on and that competent people be put in charge of the work. Other suggestions included government-backed non-profit industrial organizations integrating scientific research and higher education in response to the development of an innovative economy; the government improving its assignment of agencies to oversee non-profit government organizations; and subsidies and funding for technology and personnel.
Unfortunately, not only have these and other suggestions been made at previous conferences, they have also been discussed at many academic seminars. Even though they have been acknowledged for 20 to 30 years, the issues remain unresolved, despite several changes of leadership at the ministry and its predecessor, the National Science Council.
Are they really that difficult? Take the government’s arrangement for jurisdiction over the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) and the Science Park Administration as examples: It is strange that the ministry has jurisdiction over academic research programs and national laboratories, but not over the ITRI, which focuses on forward-looking industrial technology research and development. At the same time, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, which is in charge of the nation’s industrial development, has no jurisdiction over the Science Park Administration, which deals more with production than research, let alone the major science parks in Hsinchu, Taichung and Tainan.
Sectionalism and resource competition among government agencies have been major barriers to the development of science and technology in Taiwan. As nobody wants to make concessions, the problem drags on and has once again been brought up for discussion.
Over the past 30 years, the nation’s high-tech industry has developed well and made itself a major global hub for electronics, information technology and communications.
However, with increasingly fierce competition from China and other emerging nations, coupled with the rapid development of new technologies, the pressure on the local high-tech industry is rising fast.
As technology innovation and knowledge accumulation are the foundation of the nation’s sustainable development, and the conference is critical to technology investment and policy planning over the next four years, the government should make it a top priority to solve these old problems.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with