On July 31, China announced that it would ban individual tourists from traveling to Taiwan from Aug. 1 and threatened to extend the ban to tour groups starting next month. Taiwan’s tourism, hotel and aviation industries are all targets of this indiscriminate, anti-market abuse.
This affects every party campaigning for next year’s presidential election, but is hitting the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) campaign the hardest.
KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) hastily sent “secret envoys” to China for negotiations, and rumor now has it that Beijing might make a U-turn.
The two envoys sent to China were former Mainland Affairs Council deputy minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) and KMT Mainland Affairs Committee Director Chou Jih-shine (周繼祥).
They left on Aug. 9 and returned the next day. In that 24 hours, they had in-depth discussions with China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Liu Jieyi (劉結一) and other Chinese officials in charge of Taiwan affairs.
The KMT delegation bluntly indicated that the Chinese Ministry of Culture and Tourism’s policy was flawed and seriously damages cross-strait exchanges.
As there have been signs of positive change, Chang and Chou are to visit Beijing again for follow-up talks after updating Wu. They hope to be able to save the nation from being hurt by the ban.
According to China’s linear thinking, putting pressure on Taiwan will sabotage the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, but it forgets that 15 Taiwanese cities and counties are in the KMT’s hands.
The industries that rely heavily on Chinese tourists are also those that are the most welcoming of China “opening up,” a typical example of how ignorance can result in politics outweighing reason.
After Beijing announced the ban, some workers in affected industries petitioned the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and other government agencies for help, but the KMT was the first to be involved, due to its close Chinese connections.
Dozens of local business representatives this month visited the KMT’s Taipei headquarters asking for assistance. Pressured by the election outlook and voter anxiety, Wu had to take the situation seriously.
What the outside world cares more about is that during Chang and Chou’s visit to China, Liu seized on the opportunity to gain a thorough understanding of the campaign of KMT presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), and to investigate the likelihood that KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) will run for president.
A while ago, the TAO invited several groups of Taiwanese politicians to Beijing for a “chat,” but most of the guests found reasons to postpone or decline the invitation due to the event’s sensitive timing.
As chairman of the largest opposition party, Wu had no choice but to send envoys to Beijing, and the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party did exchange opinions on next year’s presidential election.
What did they discuss?
In a democracy, this is a serious question. The 2016 US presidential election was followed by a investigation into alleged Russian interference.
What is the status of the rule of law in Taiwan? How far can a politician go before crossing the line? Perhaps the KMT leadership owes an explanation not only to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), but also to Wang, Gou and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who might also have presidential aspirations.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Eddy Chang
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the