How can they be trusted?
A hue and cry has broken out following last week’s arrest of a National Security Bureau (NSB) agent for attempting to smuggle more than 10,000 cartons of cigarettes via the courtesy customs channel used by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as she returned from an overseas tour (“NSB official accused of smuggling,” July 23, 2019, page 1).
NSB director-general Peng Sheng-chu (彭勝竹) resigned immediately, while chief aide-de-camp to the president Chang Chieh (張捷), who was the officer in charge of presidential bodyguards, asked to be disciplined and is to be transferred to another post.
Nonetheless, the incident is probably only the tip of the iceberg. It is easy to imagine and very worrying to think how much more corruption or other illegal activities might have been going on unseen within the bureau.
If the culprits could not even resist the measly profit to be made by avoiding the tobacco tax, how can they be trusted to be incorruptible in the way they handle their day-to-day security duties? How would they respond to much bigger incentives offered by communist China?
The overriding principle of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) military strategy in preparing for possible military action against Taiwan is to preempt intervention by other nations by achieving quick victory in a short war and striking a decisive blow in the first battle.
Many of the PLA’s scenarios, including a decapitation strike, are based on this principle.
Tsai, as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and having repeatedly stated her opposition to the “one country, two systems” formula and her determination to uphold Taiwan’s sovereignty, is certainly the PLA’s prime target.
NSB agents are supposed to stand by Tsai, ensuring her security and acting as her last line of defense, but it appears as if their military discipline and personal integrity are full of holes.
If the government fails to grasp this opportunity to clean house, Tsai’s personal safety would be precarious indeed.
Huang Wei-bing
Kaohsiung
Elderly employment
On Thursday last week, the Executive Yuan passed the draft middle-aged and elderly people employment act, which allows employers to hire workers older than 65 using a time-limited labor contract. It also bans discrimination based on age and differential treatment, stipulating penalties of up to NT$1.5 million (US$48,105).
The law is designed to encourage middle-aged and older workers who want to pursue a second career to make the move, creating more job opportunities for seniors and reducing their dependence and burden on social welfare.
The law is well-intended, but it has no power to stop workplace discrimination and bullying against older workers by colleagues.
I have seen many such cases in the workplace. Although the employer was willing to hire older workers, those workers were unreasonably discriminated against, excluded and isolated. Even worse, colleagues might order them around as if senior workers are inferior people.
A friend of mine, who is almost 70 and still goes to work, told me that he often gets bullied by his supervisor, who is younger than my friend and deliberately picks on him at work.
Outside of work, no colleague wants to make friends with him.
One year at the company’s year-end banquet, there was a table with only five or six middle-aged and older colleagues, while a dozen young colleagues squeezed in at another table.
The two groups ate and talked between themselves, making this supposedly social event awkward.
Discrimination is ubiquitous throughout society, and age discrimination in the workplace is common. The draft law might encourage employers to open their doors to middle-aged and senior people, thus creating a win-win situation.
However, social conventions must keep up and the workplace culture of discrimination and prejudice against senior people must be changed to promote a senior-friendly work environment.
Lee Yue-chih
Taipei
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS