The Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) recently released the average annual wage last year — including base salary, overtime pay, bonus and remuneration — of employees at publicly listed companies on the main board. The highest average was 19 times bigger than the lowest, and the average in the electronics industry was far better than in the hospitality industry.
As all listed companies are required by the Financial Supervisory Commission to disclose the average wage of their non-managerial employees by the end of this month, the salary situation of grassroots-level employees is to be revealed, and it is expected to add more pressure on listed companies in terms of employee benefits and corporate governance.
Based on the statistics released on May 31, Foxconn Technology Co employees enjoyed the highest average annual wage of NT$5.96 million (US$189,688) last year, while employees of retail conglomerate Mercuries & Associates Holding ranked second-highest with NT$4.45 million. Chemical material manufacturer and wind farm developer Swancor Holding Co came in third with NT$3.61 million.
Renowned companies such as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, MediaTek and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co posted average annual wages of NT$3.23 million, NT$2.72 million and NT$2 million respectively.
In comparison, those working at Taiwan Sanyo Electric Co took in just NT$314,000 on average, the lowest among the 857 listed companies on the main board. Other companies listed on the TWSE that also reported annual wages below NT$400,000 included electronics retailer Tsann Kuen Enterprise Co, karaoke chain Holiday Entertainment Co, National Petroleum Corp, hotel operator Chateau International Development Co and animal feed supplier Shin Tai Industry Co.
In general, the salaries of employees in the service industry, including the distribution, hospitality and restaurant sectors, were generally lower than those in the manufacturing, technology and banking industries.
Explanations for the phenomenon vary. One is that first-time jobseekers in the service industry have been reluctant to ask for higher salaries amid long-term wage stagnation. Another is that service-oriented sectors require lower academic qualifications, and the higher proportion of employees who do not have college degrees drags down average salaries.
Other possible explanations, as suggested by several surveys, include structural factors that give rise to low-pay, atypical employment — such as contract, temporary and dispatch work — and companies hiring more hourly employees to lower personnel costs.
The issue of low wages has long been a source of complaint, even though the government has raised the salary for public employees and raised the minimum monthly pay and hourly wage.
While the government has also increased some types of individual income tax deductions to ease people’s tax burdens, the key issue remains: How can the government alleviate Taiwan’s low salary problem and income inequality?
The TWSE’s upcoming disclosure of the listed companies’ average annual salary of non-managerial employees will show if executives are being highly paid at the expense of grassroots employees. Such statistics will show whether companies have treated their employees badly even though they have continued to post increased earnings.
Companies in Taiwan have for too long faced little pressure to improve corporate governance and transparency, and it is time for employees and jobseekers to better understand the industry and equip themselves to fight for benefits.
After all, people’s choice of where to work based on which sectors have great potential for development makes a difference.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with