In an interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times, which ran an English version on Saturday last week) published on May 19, former Hong Kong-based Causeway Bay Books manager Lam Wing-kei (林榮基) gravely and earnestly urged Taiwan to oppose China’s “red” infiltration through proactive changes to cultural and educational foundations.”
Lam said that Taiwan is failing to resist Chinese propaganda, because “more than 90 percent of literature, history and philosophy books in Taiwan’s libraries are written from the perspective of China’s Confucian culture, so that Taiwanese identified with Chinese culture long before China infiltrated or gained control of Taiwanese media outlets.”
Seen in this light, reading extensively is the most effective approach to transforming culture and education.
A visit to Taiwan’s public libraries would show how insightful Lam’s observation was. For instance, in the history section of any public library, there are books about Chinese history filling shelf after shelf, with topics ranging from the general history of China to a particular period or dynasty, diplomatic history and local Chinese chorography.
By contrast, books about Taiwanese history are listed under “Asian history,” placed alongside the histories of Japan, Korea, India and other Asian nations. This is a classification and categorizing system focused on a Chinese identity.
Books on literature fare no better: For Chinese literature, a major category by itself, there are numerous subcategories, such as general introduction, collections by dynasty and period, compilations of individual works and anthologies based on genre or region.
As for Taiwanese literature, it is listed under another major category called “Oriental literature” — along with the literatures of other Asian nations.
The de-Taiwanization problem is most conspicuous when it comes to philosophy. The classification system features two major categories: Chinese philosophy and Oriental philosophy. The former is further divided into several smaller categories.
Taiwanese philosophy is nowhere to be found, except for an introduction to Lee Chun-sheng (李春生) — one of the first great Taiwanese thinkers — among very few other works related to Taiwan listed under the Chinese philosophy subcategory of modern philosophy.
Taiwanese should ask themselves why the classification system adopted by the nation’s libraries for books on literature, history and philosophy do not treat Taiwan as a subject, but rather like books from another country, or simply ignores them. These uneven collections and classification make one wonder if Taiwan is our country or a foreign land. This is proof that Taiwan is not a normal country or society and highlights the need for transitional justice.
Lam feels this issue deeply owing to his experience in Hong Kong. Causeway Bay Books was famous for selling literary, historical and philosophical books that were banned in China. The experience gave him an insight and profound knowledge about that country.
In October, 2015 Lam was “disappeared” when he crossed the border into Shenzhen. He was detained by Chinese authorities on suspicion of engaging in “illegal business operations.”
During his detention, Lam was forced to confess on TV. More than 6,000 Hong Kongers took to the streets to show their support for Lam, who returned to the territory after eight months of detention in China.
Last month, the Hong Kong government proposed amendments to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Ordinance. For fear of being extradited to China, Lam fled to Taiwan in exile.
According to Lam’s observations, China’s political constitution has never throughout history risen above feudalism and autocracy, and Hong Kong is being deprived of democracy and human rights under Beijing’s rule.
In comparison, some people in Taiwan say that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are “one family.” Enjoying Taiwan’s democracy and freedom, they still desire political union with autocratic and authoritarian China, Lam said.
This is not a simple matter of self-interest, but of mindset: Pro-unification advocates do not care about the accusations that they are selling out Taiwan and are traitors, because they are serving the nation they identify with culturally, he said.
Having experienced Chinese authoritarianism, Lam emphasized independence, which he considers the only way to realize freedom. He encourages independence for Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet and Inner Mongolia, and calls on Taiwan to make fundamental educational and cultural changes to fight Chinese infiltration.
Facing China’s thorough and ongoing infiltration, Taiwan acts like a defenseless nation to an extent that is almost incomprehensible. The nation’s public libraries are not the sole example of a confused identity that treats China as the subject and lists Taiwan as if it were a foreign nation. Legally, China is neither a foreign country nor an enemy state — it is the same country as Taiwan.
On the streets, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) flag can be seen all over Taipei — most frequently in front of Taipei 101, with the PRC national anthem playing loudly, but the authorities can do nothing to stop it because of freedom of expression.
In sports, Taiwan calls itself “Chinese Taipei” at international competitions. Many people, including Japanese, have launched and joined petitions calling for the national team’s name rectification, but these efforts are not even supported by President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, which claims to be “Taiwan-centered.”
Media outlets call the neighboring country China “the mainland” and its people “mainlanders.”
The political situation is even more mind-boggling. While China has refuted the notion of “one China, different interpretations,” Taiwanese political party officials and politicians planning to run for president next year refrain from mentioning the “Republic of China” in front of Chinese officials during their China trips, but they always speak of the so-called “1992 consensus” in Taiwan and deceive the public into accepting the idea.
All identity must be rooted in culture and education, and only by changing people’s mindset can we normalize national identity. Identifying with the land and people of Taiwan is the only way to fight Chinese infiltration and propaganda, and establish a normal country and society.
Lam’s reminder to Taiwan about the cultural and educational aspects might sound harsh, but his intentions are earnest and kind.
There are records of human activities in Taiwan dating back at least 50,000 years. For Austronesian peoples, Taiwan was the origin of dissemination and one of the ancestral homelands from which they spread out across the south Pacific and Indian oceans 6,000 years ago.
Claims that Taiwan had no history before the Dutch came in Lien Heng’s (連橫) Preface to the General History of Taiwan (台灣通史) or Taiwanese independence pioneer Su Beng’s (史明) Modern History of Taiwanese in 400 Years (台灣人四百年史) reflect a narrow Han Chinese perspective of history.
Culturally speaking, Austronesian people, the Dutch, the Spaniards, Cheng Cheng-kung’s (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) clan, the Qing Dynasty, Japan, modern China and, more recently, people from Southeast Asian countries all count as constituents and parts of Taiwanese culture.
Viewing Taiwan conversely as a constituent of another nation’s culture, as some people do, is self-degradation. In the face of Chinese infiltration, Taiwanese must recognize and have confidence in Taiwanese identity.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with