The Legislative Yuan’s Economics and Energy Committee on May 6 conditionally passed the first reading of a draft amendment to the Factory Management Act (工廠管理輔導法) regarding unregistered factories built on farmland. It is to be the second revision to the act since 2010, when it was amended to allow unregistered factories to apply for temporary registrations so that the government could regulate factories that were illegally operating on farmland.
According to Council of Agriculture statistics, there are about 45,000 illegal factories on about 14,000 hectares of farmland. Over the past decade, only 7,421 of them have been granted a temporary license and only 10 have met the conditions to gain legal status, while 40 were moved to industrial zones with the government’s help.
With the deadline for temporary licenses to expire in June next year, while the number of unregistered factories on farmland keeps increasing, the amendment is a bid to address the long-standing issue by striking a balance between environmental protection and economic development.
In 2017, then-premier Lin Chuan (林全) said that the government would initially demolish illegal factories built after May 20, 2016, followed by those built earlier. Last year, then-premier William Lai (賴清德) said that the government would seek ways to help unregistered factories — most of them small or medium-sized — gain legal status, rather than extending the deadline. The draft amendment approved by Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) has devised mechanisms to regulate unregistered factories built before May 20, 2016, while denying leniency to those built after that.
The latest amendment aims to allow unregistered factories built before May 20, 2016, to continue operating past next year’s deadline, provided that they meet environmental and safety standards, and pay for land restoration and restitution for any pollution they caused.
The issue has existed for several decades. Unfortunately, the government has a poor track record addressing the issue, regardless of which party was in power. The problem continued because those who built the factories took a chance that the authorities would not find out.
However, this new amendment faces a fundamental problem: To ensure the interests of local industries, protect the livelihood of workers at unregistered factories and maintain economic growth, the government is creating a back door to assist unregistered operations to become legitimate. Creating this back door risks exacerbating the problem, especially if the lax enforcement and poor execution of the past persists. Instead of curbing unregistered factories, the proposed rule changes would encourage illegal factories to occupy farmland and make them less likely to use industrial zones.
Next year’s presidential and legislative elections make it difficult for the government to maintain a strict stance on unregistered factories, but those in power need to keep in mind that they are given power by the people to provide the greatest benefit to the nation as a whole. So, while the government is aiming to legitimize unlicensed establishments by giving them standards to meet, it still needs to include sunset provisions that would require less-polluting unregistered factories to gain a license and high-polluting ones to move to industrial zones within a certain timeframe or face being demolished.
Regulating unregistered factories is important for the economy, but the issue also needs to take into account social fairness and justice, the nation’s agriculture, people’s health and the environment.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with