A same-sex union special act drafted by HTC chairwoman Cher Wang’s (王雪紅) Faith, Hope and Love Foundation and proposed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Tai-hua (林岱樺) proceeded to a second legislative reading on May 3. Alongside the Executive Yuan’s “enforcement act of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748” and a “same-sex family members special act” sponsored by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆), the three draft bills were on Thursday sent to cross-caucus talks presided over by Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全).
Laws formulated to cover family members and relatives, marriages or any horizontal union between two people should never disregard a family’s vertical relationships. There are already many same-sex families in Taiwan whose children were born after an anonymous sperm donation and artificial insemination. These children are lineal descendants of one of the parents in a legal parent-child relationship.
What requires particular consideration from lawmakers is how to give the other spouse in the same-sex marriage — who is not the biological parent, but who is willing to raise the child with their partner — the legal right to rear, protect and educate the child with the partner in the best interests of the child, rather than the adults.
This seems to be the core concern for people who trumpet the protection of family values and advocate the concept of family responsibilities. Parents determined to give birth to children and raise them together should also be allowed to jointly exercise their rights and fulfill their responsibilities. The law should recognize the parent-child relationship between the non-biological parent and their partner’s child.
This is why the Cabinet’s draft, written by the Ministry of Justice, allows a spouse in a same-sex marriage to adopt the other spouse’s biological children.
The court, after ensuring that the spouses want to jointly raise the child and that the relationship is in the child’s best interests, approves the adoption, which grants parent-child rights, but also the obligation to care for the child — in the same way as for heterosexual families. Stable relationships not easily renounced are in the best interest of adopted children.
Lin’s and Lai’s bills only allow a spouse in a same-sex marriage who is the biological parent to grant the other spouse — who is not a blood relation of the child — partial guardianship. Their idea is that guardianship would allow the spouse of the biological parent to contribute to the child’s care and protection. The same mechanism exists in the Civil Code (民法) and most people in a same-sex relationship have already authorized their partner to be the guardian of their children.
In principle, the law allows biological parents to authorize any trusted person to perform the function of a guardian, regardless of their relationship to the child. Even a nanny can be the authorized guardian of a child.
From a legal perspective, should two parents who bring up a child together be considered nannies or parents? The Lin and Lai versions prefer creating a guardianship that can be terminated, leaving children who are used to having two people caring for them with only one.
What does that mean for the family stability that Lin and Lai advocate for or their position that having two parents is better than one? The adoption approach gives the child greater security. An adoption can only be broken by a court, not the will of the parents.
If a same-sex couple breaks up, the one exercising guardianship over the child can renounce the relationship and become free of further responsibility. If the guardian had greater financial means, the breakup could result in a sudden decline in the child’s care.
Opponents of same-sex marriage use the justification that they protect “the happiness of the next generation,” but in refusing to give equal rights to same-sex families, the best interests of the children are ignored.
Closer scrutiny of the posturing of lawmakers and lobbyists reveals their focus on the selfish interests of adults: the nature of kinship, whether the biological or the adoptive parent is the child’s true family after a breakup.
From the beginning, opponents of same-sex marriage never really considered the issue from the perspective of protecting the well-being of children. The legislators, before casting their votes, should think twice about which version conforms to the best interests of the children.
Kuan Hsiao-wei is an associate professor of law at National Taipei University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with