The system of international cooperation that emerged from the ashes of World War II is at risk. Multilateralism and the institutions that support it — including the WTO, the UN and the EU — are being called into question as more nations embrace inward-looking nationalism, leading in some cases to political instability and conflict.
So why are business and finance leaders not doing much more to combat these troubling trends?
Postwar history shows that global economic integration — including freer trade and higher cross-border investment — helps markets and societies to prosper, with health, education and life expectancy improving significantly in many parts of the world.
True, globalization has also produced major societal imbalances, which are fueling popular discontent, but rejecting it, as a growing number now do, threatens the very system that has helped to create wealth, combat poverty and expand the ranks of the global middle class.
Business and finance have arguably benefited the most from the open, rules-based international political and economic order, yet chief executives and chairpersons rarely use their influential voices to defend multilateralism and global cooperation.
This is partly because most private enterprises still focus on bread-and-butter lobbying, often via trade associations, in connection with national regulations and policies.
Similarly, corporate boards tend to deal with basic governance and risk-management issues, and seldom address broader geopolitical concerns — and when they do, directors are often unsure how to make a meaningful contribution.
However, in the face of increasing global disorder, business and finance leaders can no longer afford to be reticent. Instead, they should do three things to make a strong, renewed case for international cooperation.
For starters, they need to rediscover and recommit to the core values and principles of key multilateral organizations, principally the WTO and the UN.
These organizations embody the belief that, more often than not, countries will achieve better long-term outcomes by acting together than by going it alone.
In this regard, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres made a persuasive case for a “networked multilateralism” that connects bodies such as his with important regional organizations and initiatives.
Second, corporate chiefs should formally endorse important multilateral private-sector initiatives.
The thousands of companies and investors that have signed the UN Global Compact and the Principles for Responsible Investment, for example, are still in the minority. Many more must step up and sign on.
Other important private-sector programs with a multilateral origin or orientation include the banking sector’s Equator Principles (originally from the World Bank) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
These and other similar initiatives help in two ways. Many of them — including the UN Global Compact — involve multi-stakeholder collaboration. In other words, they bring together the private and public sectors, civil society and other actors to address critical international issues such as the rule of law, global governance and climate change.
In addition, global policymakers frequently respond to these initiatives and coalitions by creating new possibilities for cooperation.
The UN, for example, launched an exercise in multilateralism with a financial twist: an annual investment forum designed to promote collaboration and deal-making between governments and institutional investors.
Finally, business and finance leaders should triple down on the new global sustainability agenda. This is arguably the best hedge against current threats, challenges and insecurities, and presents extraordinary opportunities to make a positive global impact.
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their associated targets are a blueprint for humanity and for the global economy. Achieving the SDGs would make globalization more sustainable and inclusive, while also effectively addressing the threat of climate change.
Private-sector organizations need to integrate the SDGs into their business and investment strategies, and not only for altruistic reasons.
The Business and Sustainable Development Commission previously estimated that companies and investors could unlock at least US$12 trillion in market opportunities by 2030 and create up to 380 million jobs by pursuing just a few key SDGs.
At the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, in January, the UN Global Compact and Pacific Investment Management Co (PIMCO) jointly urged companies, investors and governments around the world to make the SDGs a high priority and explore ways of financing progress toward them, including through new instruments such as “SDG bonds.”
Global cooperation is crucial for our common security and economic success, but it is under threat. By publicly supporting multilateralism, business and finance leaders can help to shape a more prosperous and sustainable future — for their organizations and the world.
Lise Kingo is executive officer of the UN Global Compact. Scott Mather is chief investment officer of US core strategies at PIMCO.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS