Central bank Governor Yang Chin-long (楊金龍) last week hinted that the bank is in no hurry to adjust key interest rates, as it continues to base its decisions on data and has not seen any significant change in economic conditions.
If the bank’s board at its quarterly meeting on March 21 maintains its stance, that would mark 11 consecutive quarters without any change to the bank’s policy rates — the rediscount rate, the rate on accommodations with collateral and the rate on accommodations without collateral.
Economists expect no rate changes this year and next, considering an economic slowdown and relatively low inflationary pressure, but the inevitable question is: Will low interest rates support or weaken the economy in the long run?
Prior to the latest economic slowdown, there was speculation that the central bank would normalize its monetary policy and absorb excess liquidity in the banking system, which has expanded steadily since the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.
However, the bank now appears to have joined many of its global peers in postponing efforts to return real interest rates to their normal levels amid growth worries.
The European Central Bank last week said that eurozone interest rates would be kept at near-historic lows until the end of the year, while it would offer ultracheap loans to banks to prevent a continued downturn and rising uncertainty from hurting the region.
The US Federal Reserve in December 2015 started its first tightening cycle in more than a decade, after years of ultra-accommodating monetary policy. That was followed by a wave of monetary normalization by other central banks attempting to prevent asset-price bubbles. However, after nine interest rate hikes as of December last year, the Fed appears to have turned more dovish, with financial market pressures in the last quarter of last year proving the turning point for its rate-hike stance.
Since then, the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Bank of England have paused their normalization cycles, while the Bank of Japan has said that it would continue its accommodative monetary policy and the Reserve Bank of India unexpectedly cut interest rates last month to boost the economy.
In the meantime, the People’s Bank of China has continued to cut tax rates and lower reserve requirement ratios for banks as China’s economy slows.
The central banks’ cautious attitudes suggest that growth in the world’s major economies is experiencing a synchronized slowdown with no clear bottom in sight; some economies even face the risk of a recession. However, the persistence of low interest rates raises the question of whether the situation is the new normal and when the low-rate era might end.
There are also other concerns. Low rates benefit businesses, but disadvantage savers. If the narrower net interest margins received by banks harm profitability and capital in the long term, they could reduce lending, leading to weaker productivity growth for businesses and affecting the economy.
In this regard, there is reason to doubt whether low interest rate policies to boost the economy are justifiable.
Last week, Yang said that interest rates would rise if household income increases, inflation climbs, inbound investments increase steadily and the economy sees sustained growth. However, he stopped short of offering a timeframe.
At this point, still-weak economic growth is probably the largest hurdle for rate hikes by the central bank in the near future. However, over the longer term, lower rates discourage household savings and reduce returns for pensioners in an economy where the population is aging at an alarming rate.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with