Every time I come out of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall, I see the Taipei Dome standing before me like a solidified mushroom cloud. No wonder Taipei Computer Association chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) said that it made him feel “very oppressed.”
I have asked a lot of people and they all have similar feelings. The main reason is probably that the dome stands too close to the road, with no space around it. None of the world’s biggest domes were built like that. In the case of the Tokyo Dome, it is adjoined by leisure grounds that even include a hot spring spa.
The Taipei Dome is surrounded by three listed monuments — Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall, the Songshan Tobacco Factory and the Taipei Railway Workshop — so the space left for it could be expected to be cramped, which highlights how it was built in the wrong place.
Originally, back when Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was president, the plan was to build the Taipei Dome in the Guandu (關渡) area, which would have been a much better option than the present location. The Council for Cultural Affairs, which later became the Ministry of Culture, later decided that parts of the Songshan Tobacco Factory were worth preserving as a monument. The area available for building the Taipei Dome was thus reduced to 10 hectares.
Former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his successor, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), vigorously promoted the build-operate-transfer project.
Eight years ago, then-Control Yuan president Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) urged Hau to have the vision to build more parks. Wang even urged the public to take to the streets and demand that the government give back green areas that were rightfully theirs.
Four years ago, Tung said that Ma and Hau had been too devoted to the project and were trying to evade Taipei City councilors’ oversight.
Three years ago, Taipei Department of Urban Development Commissioner Lin Jou-min (林洲民) said that the Taipei Dome’s construction differed from the original plans in 79 ways. It later emerged that 17 emergency staircases had been dismantled.
It might be normal for a few small changes to be made to the plans, but if there are too many changes, people are bound to become suspicious. If those changes involve removing escape routes, it could be a matter of life or death.
Businesspeople put their business interests first, and it is more profitable to build shops than fire escapes, but, as Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said: “It is fine to make money in business, but you should not be too greedy.”
Taipei politicians seem to be a bit obsessed with domes. Three decades ago they wanted to build a big gymnasium on the land that is now the Daan Forest Park (大安森林公園), but six magazines — including CommonWealth Magazine, Global Views Monthly and Unitas — simultaneously published an advertisement with the headline: “Keep Taipei’s last lung — a complete Park No. 7.” At that point, the Taipei Dome idea was temporarily put on hold.
In the years before World War II, there was already a plan to create 17 urban parks in Taipei, of which Park No. 7 is today’s Daan Forest Park.
Park No. 6 became Zhongshan Park, where Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall was built, but it can no longer be called the city’s lung, because, as well as having the memorial hall inside it, Guangfu Elementary School also occupies one-fifth of the land originally intended for the park.
Luckily, four of the other areas designated for building parks have not been developed, so there is still a chance for Taipei residents to get those parks. After all, New York City got its Central Park because New Yorkers voted for candidates who wanted to build it.
If the Taipei Dome does eventually get built, even though the mushroom cloud will be like a tumor in the middle of the city, let us hope that Taipei’s dome ideas end there and it can develop into a garden city instead.
Lu Ching-fu is a university professor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with