When the Executive Yuan submitted its most recent draft amendments to the Labor Insurance Act (勞工保險條例) to the Legislative Yuan for review in April 2017, it said that the government would subsidize the Labor Insurance Fund by NT$20 billion (US$651 million at the current exchange rate) every year to improve the labor insurance program’s financial situation.
The bills also included other measures to keep the fund afloat for several more years, such as raising insurance premiums by 0.5 percentage points every year until they reach 12 percent and expanding the insured salary level by 12 months each year, with payout eventually being based on the average of the person’s highest monthly salary in the previous 180 months, up from 60 months.
However, even if the draft amendments are passed during the new legislative session, which starts on Friday, they would only prevent the fund from going bankrupt for two more years, because of the unsustainable contribution-benefit formula — and neither government nor opposition lawmakers appear to have any intention to address the fund’s predicted insolvency soon, due to political calculations ahead of next year’s presidential and legislative elections.
To assess how likely lawmakers are to address the issue seriously, it suffices to look at how badly pension reforms for retired military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers hit the Democratic Progressive Party in the local elections on Nov. 24 last year.
However, if no bold and effective measures are taken soon, the labor insurance program might collapse earlier than expected. Based on a Ministry of Labor projection at the end of last month, the Labor Insurance Fund, which manages NT$686 billion in assets, might run dry by 2028 if lawmakers were to approve the draft amendments this year. This is worrying news for Taiwan’s 10 million workers and only two years longer than originally projected, due to the nation’s falling birthrate and aging population.
According to the labor ministry’s calculations, an appropriate premium rate for the fund to stay afloat would be 27.94 percent, but the actual rate is only about 10 percent, which means premiums fail to cover rising payouts. The system is also economically unsustainable if the long-term demographic trend remains unchanged — meaning that more people would claim labor insurance benefits, while fewer people make contributions.
Total insurance premiums in 2016 still exceeded payouts by NT$8.8 billion, but the labor insurance fund saw a shortfall of NT$27.5 billion (NT$355.4 billion in premiums collected minus NT$382.9 billion in payouts) in 2017, which was followed by a NT$25.1 billion deficit (NT$364.4 billion in premiums collected minus NT$389.6 billion in payouts) last year.
If the parties involved — including workers, businesses and government officials — continue to neglect the labor insurance system’s problems and fail to agree on courageous and wide-ranging reforms, a crisis is inevitable in the not-too-distant future, with many workers possibly unable to collect their pensions by the time they retire and businesses struggling to meet their profit targets due to lower worker productivity.
The government’s role is ideally that of a guarantor of last resort, but by that time it would have its hands tied due to growing social conflict and political bickering, making it impossible to push any meaningful reforms — no matter which party is in power.
Selfishness is part of human nature, yet in the face of the imminent crisis, the nation as a whole needs to find workable compromises through rational dialogue.
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
RSS