After a tumultuous year for LGBTQ rights in Taiwan, there is finally some sort of timetable for same-sex marriage to be written into law after the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday last week announced that it would have a bill ready for the Legislative Yuan’s review before March 1.
However, under the Council of Grand Justices’ Constitutional Interpretation No. 748 last year, same-sex couples are to be able to register for marriage automatically from May 24. Is that really enough time for lawmakers to come to an agreement on the contents of the special law and pass three readings? The legislature was already having a difficult time agreeing to a law prior to the interpretation, which was meant to provide clarity on the nation’s direction on the issue.
However, things have become more confusing after the interpretation, as the government never took action, despite making multiple promises, clearly intending to drag the process on until the deadline. Meanwhile, the government’s delay allowed the groups opposed to marriage equality to mount a wildly successful campaign leading up to last month’s referendums, in which voters rejected same-sex marriage being included in the Civil Code.
Despite the Judicial Yuan confirming that a special law is to be made that would not contradict the constitutional interpretation, the government has gotten itself stuck between the majority opinion and the Constitution due to its failure to act and meet its promises. And this is a government that needs all the public support it can get after losing big in the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections.
Of course, the Constitution trumps public opinion, but it is difficult to say what the contents of the special law will be like, and the public should be watching closely. If the legislature is unable to pass a law before May 24, same-sex couples can still get married under the Civil Code — but if the special law ends up being significantly different from the Civil Code, it will turn into a bureaucratic nightmare for everyone involved. In such a scenario, those who want to get married would try to do it as soon as possible, which would cause even further tumult.
There should be no more delays, and if the government has promised that the special law will not contradict the constitutional interpretation, it should keep that stance regardless of the referendum results and the words of the opposition, who will surely not back down in the next few months. If not, it would lose whatever credibility it has left.
If the government lets this turn into another battle that drags on once again, it would only give the groups opposing same-sex marriage more fodder to spread their disinformation, and they have the money and resources for a long-term siege — which would only hurt the LGBTQ community in the end while the results would remain the same. Why go through all the trouble and make yourself look even worse in the process?
Taiwanese should still feel proud that Taiwan is to be the first nation in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage — it is just that the whole ordeal has put a damper on the celebratory mood and society is obviously not as progressive as people might think.
In this case, same-sex marriage is already a given. However, more concerning is what will happen to education, which is the only way to change public sentiment. Gender equity education will be even more difficult after the referendums showed the public’s opinion, which might cause elected officials to be even more reluctant to speak out in support of the LGBTQ community, as that is apparently against the wishes of most of their constituents.
Public opinion does not change overnight — it often takes generations — but it is clear that whatever the government decides to do with its gender equity education will have a huge impact.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with