Last month, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed appointed a new Cabinet; 10 of the 20 positions went to women. One week later, the nation’s parliament unanimously elected Sahle-Work Zewde as Ethiopia’s first female president, and a week after that, lawmakers appointed Meaza Ashenafi to serve as the first female Supreme Court president.
Ethiopia is not alone. Rwandan President Paul Kagame last month installed a gender-balanced Cabinet. Rwanda already had the world’s highest percentage of women in a national parliament; now, it is to have even more female leaders.
While Ethiopia and Rwanda are at the forefront of Africa’s push for gender parity in politics, other African countries are not far behind.
Six of the world’s 20 top countries in terms of the share of legislative seats held by women are in Sub-Saharan Africa, and in two African countries toward the bottom of the global list — Nigeria and Mali — politicians are discussing ways to increase female representation.
This shift is as inspiring as it is historic. By appointing so many young, energetic female leaders — such as Rwandan Minister of Information and Communications Technology and Innovation Paula Ingabire, Malian Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Kamissa Camara or Botswanan Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Bogolo Kenewendo — African countries are demonstrating that young women can aspire to, and achieve, impactful goals.
These changes are essential not only for the sake of fairness, but also for Africa’s long-term prosperity. On a continent where the average age of presidents is 62, Africa needs more young women in power to reflect the talent and desires of its young population. To sustain Africa’s socioeconomic progress, young women must be in leadership positions.
Women experience the world differently than men. We grow up navigating cultural norms and expectations that, while certainly constraining, give us insights that are essential for inclusive policymaking.
A growing body of evidence shows that women’s political leadership strengthens governance capacity, improves cooperation with allies and across parties, and advances issues such as parental leave and childcare, access to pensions and the elimination of gender-based violence.
While it is unreasonable — and indeed undesirable — to expect that women would agree on all issues or be equally gender-sensitive in their politics, it is fair to assume that a female leader’s ideas will be informed by her unique experiences.
As leaders everywhere strive to build more equitable societies, they must not underestimate the importance of giving political voice to gendered expertise.
In much of the world, and in many African countries, a woman’s place is widely believed to be in the home; public space is regarded as a male domain.
When governments in Africa boldly and intentionally crowd women into decisionmaking bodies and entrust them with power, they are directly challenging these outdated assumptions.
With more female role models, young women and girls will be able to imagine new career possibilities, parents will chart new paths of success for their daughters, teachers will teach girls differently, and social and cultural barriers will fall.
Some critics say that gender quotas in government are condescending and unnecessary, but in many parts of the world, they are essential. In some societies, for example, women cannot easily vote, meaning that even when female candidates are on the ballot, it can be difficult for them to garner electoral support.
Ethiopia and Rwanda have recognized this challenge and have moved to address it. Moreover, by appointing gender-balanced Cabinets, leaders are intentionally addressing a common experience for women in politics: being vastly outnumbered by male counterparts. These two governments have the opportunity to bring women’s perspective to bear on the challenges their countries face.
The creation of gender-equal Cabinets reinforces the message that progress is about more than building individual capacity. Rather, it also requires transforming the structures and institutions that govern society.
For young African women, the past few weeks of political change represents a milestone in the continuing push for gender equality, marking the beginning of a new era of progress for the continent.
Fatima Al Ansar, an alumna of the African Leadership Academy, is head of mission at the Malian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, founder of Tilwalte Girls Peace Network, a 2017 Oxford Consortium on Human Rights Fellow and a Mastercard Foundation Scholar. Shona Bezanson is associate director of the Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with